Jump to content

Talk:Pimpin' (song)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articlePimpin' (song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 14, 2011Peer reviewReviewed
January 10, 2012Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Good article

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Pimpin' (song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jivesh boodhun (talk · contribs) 12:32, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Overview

[edit]

Infobox

[edit]
  • I see August 30, 2005 and Digital download. So was it released? At least to radio? Or a digital outlet?
    • I can't find any actual reference (at the usual sources, such as FMBQ or Mediabase) that says that the song was ever officially released to radio, so I presume that the airplay was unsolicited: I can also find no reference to a CD single, so I have listed digital download as it is the only format in which the song can be purchased separately (the date is thus the release date of the album "Pimpin'" appears on). See "Migrate (song)" for a similar example. I Am RufusConversation is a beautiful thing. 22:31, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

[edit]

Background and composition

[edit]
I love the job here.

Critical reception

[edit]
Try to avoid overuse of the word song

Chart performance

[edit]

Music video

[edit]

Credits and personnel

[edit]

Charts

[edit]

References

[edit]

1. Remove author

8. Publisher is Todd Burns

12. MTV will do in the place of MTV music + it should not be in italics.

As it currently stands

[edit]
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Jivesh1205 (Talk) 13:04, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Busy tonight, so I've fixed everything I can do for now: I'll finish off tomorrow. Thanks. I Am RufusConversation is a beautiful thing. 22:31, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 06:14, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
All done? Jivesh1205 (Talk) 17:52, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes. I Am RufusConversation is a beautiful thing. 17:59, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Passing. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 18:05, 10 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]