Talk:Physique photography

Nudity Low‑importance

	Nudity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Nudity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of nudity and naturism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NudityWikipedia:WikiProject NudityTemplate:WikiProject Nuditynudity articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Photography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Photography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of photography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhotographyWikipedia:WikiProject PhotographyTemplate:WikiProject PhotographyPhotography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Title

(Just putting this out there pre-emptively because I could imagine the title being slightly controversial.)

I chose the current title because it is the WP:COMMONNAME for this topic in RS by a long way.

I can see an argument that the current title is ambiguous, but consider:

There is no extant article that could use the title "physique photography" that we need to disambiguate between
When searching Google News for "physique photography" or "physique photographer", the vast majority of the results are about the topic described in this article. Similar results for Google Books and Google Scholar. Web search results are less clear, but are mostly not reliable sources (e.g. random YouTube videos, facebook pages, Etsy stores, etc.)

So I don't think there's a reason to even go for any more specific WP:NATURALDIS like "Male physique photography" or "Homoerotic physique photography". Colin M (talk) 00:09, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]