Talk:Phosphatase/GA1

CLOSED

Reviewer was blocked and this is being closed with no result as the nine-minute review was clearly flawed. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:57, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
I am planning to review this article. Reviewer: SahabAliwadia (talk · contribs) 09:42, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@SahabAliwadia: Seriously? You need to first get yourself acquainted with Wikipedia's Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources. Your own created and written articles are in such a poor standard. --Saqib (talk) 09:47, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Saqib: This is not the place of fight. And this page is not your talk page so that you are saying me this. I found myself good for it, so I am doing it. Remember that were blocked once for your this act. SahabAli wadia 09:51, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@SahabAliwadia: Ideally, our reviewers should have good knowledge of WP's policies and guidelines or at least should be able to identify between the reliable and non-reliable sources which you seems to be cannot, therefore I suggest you to avoid reviewing GA candidates for a while and take a moment to get some understanding of Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources. --Saqib (talk) 12:03, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note The reviewer User:SahabAliwadia has been blocked so this review should be discarded. --Saqib (talk) 13:39, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Review is being terminated per the above and nomination returned without loss of seniority to the pool of nominations awaiting a qualified reviewer; original review was clearly unqualified and blocked for other cogent reasons shortly after his nine-minute review here. BlueMoonset (talk) 15:57, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Support

Support This article is well-written, with original research, and so I am finding it fit for GA. SahabAli wadia 09:51, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.