Talk:Philosophy for Children
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
No adversarial material, no criticism, suspect... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 205.205.142.75 (talk) 04:13, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
What is Philosophy for Children and where is this article going?
[edit]What is Philosophy for Children- this article doesn't define it- it mainly seems to be an undergraduate reading list all without ISBNs that we could link to- and a list of pedagogic experiments. I want to know all about it- but the final External link to Stanford tells me more with remarkably similar wording- I didn't do PPE at Oxford so I have no background skills in writing in philosophy-speak. Is someone else going to take the lead?--ClemRutter (talk) 19:49, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
External links
[edit]- There are twelve entries in the "External links". Three seems to be an acceptable number and of course, everyone has their favorite to add for four. The problem is that none is needed for article promotion.
- ELpoints #3) states:
Links in the "External links" section should be kept to a minimum. A lack of external links or a small number of external links is not a reason to add external links.
- LINKFARM states:
There is nothing wrong with adding one or more useful content-relevant links to the external links section of an article; however, excessive lists can dwarf articles and detract from the purpose of Wikipedia. On articles about topics with many fansites, for example, including a link to one major fansite may be appropriate.
- WP:ELMIN:
Minimize the number of links
.
- Trim links and remove 2013 career maintenance tag. -- Otr500 (talk) 02:56, 8 March 2023 (UTC)