Talk:Philip Lonergan

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 2 December 2021 by reviewer Missvain (talk · contribs).

Screenwriters Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Screenwriters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of screenwriting, screenwriters, and related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScreenwritersWikipedia:WikiProject ScreenwritersTemplate:WikiProject Screenwritersscreenwriter articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (assessed as Low-importance).
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Reviewer Comment

Well, there have been at least two wrong answers with regard to this draft. [

User:ClarityFiend - Why was this draft Rejected rather than declined? On its face, it shows multiple films. In my opinion, a draft should only be Rejected for notability if it:

1. Has been deleted at AFD (and even then, sometimes a decline is better).
2. Does not make a credible claim of significance, so that it would qualify for A7 in mainspace.
3. It is being tendentiously resubmitted.

Robert McClenon (talk) 19:32, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:FloridaArmy - Do not simply resubmit a draft that was Rejected. That is normally considered disruptive, and is likely to result in deletion of the draft or a topic-ban. If you think that the rejection was improper (which it was), try to discuss this, if not with the rejecting reviewer, at the Teahouse, or somewhere, or somewhere else. You have already been sanctioned, and you do not need any partial blocks.

User:Theroadislong - Do you think that the subject does not satisfy creative notability?

Robert McClenon (talk) 19:31, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's possible, but I don't think the draft shows that? The films that are sourced are not notable and the notable films have no sources to connect them. I would not have rejected it, FAs articles are usually hurriedly thrown together but rarely not notable . Theroadislong (talk) 19:39, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

User:Theroadislong - I will let a fourth reviewer deal with it. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:28, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]