Talk:Philadelphia Fury (2011–2019)

Philadelphia Low‑importance

	Philadelphia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philadelphia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Philadelphia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhiladelphiaWikipedia:WikiProject PhiladelphiaTemplate:WikiProject PhiladelphiaPhiladelphia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pennsylvania Low‑importance

	Pennsylvania portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pennsylvania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pennsylvania on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PennsylvaniaWikipedia:WikiProject PennsylvaniaTemplate:WikiProject PennsylvaniaPennsylvania articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Football: American & Canadian Low‑importance

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American and Canadian soccer task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Fair use rationale for Image:PhiladelphiaFury78logo.gif

Image:PhiladelphiaFury78logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:13, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:PhiladelphiaFury78logo.gif

Image:PhiladelphiaFury78logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 16:32, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 5 July 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved. Consensus that this team is not the PT and needs to be disambiguated. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 01:31, 14 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Philadelphia Fury → Philadelphia Fury (2011–2019) – Team has not operated since 2019. Social media pages have no updates since then, or now deleted. Website has no updates since then. League has completed removed them from the their website. Move to disambiguated title and turn base into a disambiguation page. Not a primary topic anymore (if ever) RedPatch (talk) 18:18, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. RedPatch (talk) 18:19, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Giant Snowman 18:37, 6 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per WP:TWODAB. What's wrong with a hatnote? The older team gets a similarly insignificant number of views. SnowFire (talk) 15:24, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment If they both get insignificant page views, then neither is a WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. In fact, the old team gets slightly more page views so why would the lesser viewed be primary? Per WP:TWODAB and WP:NOPRIMARY "If there are multiple topics (even just two) to which a given title might refer, but there is no primary topic, then the base name should lead the reader to the disambiguation page for the term"RedPatch (talk) 17:31, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support the original gets 260 (and 395 from the redirect!) views compared with 239[[1]] for this one. Crouch, Swale (talk) 18:09, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Nothing suggests that either one is the primary topic here. :3 F4U (they /it) 23:06, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.