Talk:Phil Pressey/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Disc Wheel (talk · contribs) 15:01, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Everything checks out, the prose, lead, and sources. My only concern is the lack of photo(s). Are there not any available in the commons? I feel like you could put a picture of his father in near the personal section, provided there is one. The article just needs a single photo in my opinion. Disc Wheel (Malk + Montributions) 15:01, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
- There are no images on commons. I have made some relicensing queries on flickr. However, WP:WIAGA does not require any images. Thus, if images are your only concern, this article should pass.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 16:24, 10 February 2013 (UTC)
- Never knew that... well good work then. Disc Wheel (Malk + Montributions) 16:35, 10 February 2013 (UTC)