Talk:Pharmacological torture

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Pharmacological torture article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find medical sources: Source guidelines · PubMed · Cochrane · DOAJ · Gale · OpenMD · ScienceDirect · Springer · Trip · Wiley · TWL

Archives: 1: 2 months

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Pharmacological torture.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pharmacology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pharmacology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PharmacologyWikipedia:WikiProject PharmacologyTemplate:WikiProject Pharmacologypharmacology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Human rights

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Philosophy: Ethics / Social and political Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Ethics
	Social and political philosophy

Clinically insane preamble writer

I think an institutionalized paranoid schizophrenic has been checking this wiki page every other day for the last 10 months to make sure their horribly written paragraph stays up 2600:1009:B128:C11C:54C6:B7C3:C980:F9CD (talk) 02:25, 14 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That's an awfully strong diagnosis from a seemingly well constructed logical argument. What's incorrect about it? Are you some medical/pharmacy damage control? That seems far more likely from the posting and your entirely over the top and far reaching conclusions. 2601:242:C202:1090:298A:F443:81C7:8F4 (talk) 21:38, 18 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Moreover, from an ethical perspective, if this page is actually frequently visited by someone struggling with mental health conditions and psychiatric pain, the OP's comment just invalidated them, made their conditions worse, and might potentially cause them their life.

A much better approach would be to develop this page further, with substantive research and evidence, in order to validate the person in question, and later perhaps in this page offer help, ranging from online conversations and dialectics, to friendly and humanitarian legal resources to restore their autonomy and freedom, and, if they consent to such, psychiatric care of higher standard, one with actual respect to their autonomy.

So to the person in question should you exist: we see you, we hear you, your pains are valid, the persecution you perceive is true, and there is always hope for you; and to the OP: shut up.

PS. And just so you know... I don't know if these atrocious practices have ceased in EU and America, but I can definitely tell you, being fueled by various social and political motives, it hasn't in China (e.g. Yang Yongxin), and me and my fellow dissident activists constantly face such atrocities.

--Fourier-Deligne Transgirl (talk) 00:25, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

To the OP: It’s informative and to the point and for that I applaud the writer.

So damage control it is!

How many times have you visited this page? Maybe you should seek more help.

98.46.111.225 (talk) 05:26, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

TODO: Alleged use - China

The subject is self-explanatory. Fourier-Deligne Transgirl (talk) 23:59, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]