Jump to content

Talk:Peter Vincenti/GA2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Kosack (talk · contribs) 19:54, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]


I'll take this one on, will post review as soon as possible. Kosack (talk) 19:54, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Initial review

Infobox

[edit]
  • The note regarding his Aldershot stats doesn't appear to do anything. It needs to bring up the note when pressed, in the same way Nikola Žigić's note appears.

Lead

[edit]
  • "Vincenti joined then League Two club Coventry City", I don't think we need then here.

Early career

[edit]
  • "He was top goalscorer for Jersey in the Island Games, held in Rhodes in June 2007, Vincenti won Jersey Footballer of the Year in 2007." This sentence seems like a mix of two separate ones and doesn't really work.
  • Link League One in the final sentence, first mention outside the lead.

Style of play

[edit]
  • "comfortable playing in central midfielder and as a forward" slightly off here, should be "in central midfield" or "as a central midfielder".

Notes

[edit]
  • This section should probably be below the honours section.

References

[edit]
  • Ref 32, Mansfield Town FC > F.C.
  • Ref 91 has an available author.
  • Refs 93 and 94 appear to have expired, any chance of recovering these?

That's what I've noted in an initial run through. I notice this underwent a previous GA review, albeit some time ago, and failed largely on sourcing. I've taken a look at the points that were raised there and can say that the issue appears to have been dealt with, all information is correctly attributed with inline citations. Placed on hold for now. Kosack (talk) 19:50, 1 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Kosack: Thanks for reviewing the article, Kosack. I have made all of the above changes. Also, you're right, this article did fail to meet GA standard around a decade ago due to sourcing. Before putting the article up for review again I went through and sorted all of that too. Cheers. SBFCEdit (talk) 00:54, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Nice work, I'm happy this meets the GA criteria. Promoting. Kosack (talk) 19:37, 2 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]