Talk:Peter Obi/GA3
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Nominator: SafariScribe (talk · contribs) 22:13, 9 July 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Czarking0 (talk · contribs) 14:48, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
I currently have a lot of comments under coverage just in the first section. I don't think it is worth being more through until those are addressed.
- Hi Czarking0, I will address all the concern, but please give me time. I will ping you when am done. Thanks.Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 19:50, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @Czarking0, I haven't gotten to add yet, but I'd love to understand them well. Here it goes, would you mind continuing the review, and towards each one, you let me know what to add there, and I will do that asap. For instance, you could leave the original comments where they are, and then just say start from the beginning, when we reach each segment/section, then ask me to do that. That may be the only way of getting those fixed. I don't know if you understood the logic? Thanks. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 16:56, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
- I think I understand you meaning. I have expanded my review for what I had time to do today. Czarking0 (talk) 23:00, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
- Hey Safari are you planning on making some progress here? Czarking0 (talk) 17:34, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Czarking0, I'm so so sorry for not responding. I searched for sources and more content but found less or none. You may wish I withdraw or you fail it. Thank you for the kind help. I have many others listed for GAR at WP: WikiProject Nigeria. Cheers! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 18:08, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- I found another source about his governor position here available via WP:TWL Czarking0 (talk) 02:03, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- and here Czarking0 (talk) 02:04, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- @Czarking0, I'm so so sorry for not responding. I searched for sources and more content but found less or none. You may wish I withdraw or you fail it. Thank you for the kind help. I have many others listed for GAR at WP: WikiProject Nigeria. Cheers! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 18:08, 14 August 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @Czarking0, I haven't gotten to add yet, but I'd love to understand them well. Here it goes, would you mind continuing the review, and towards each one, you let me know what to add there, and I will do that asap. For instance, you could leave the original comments where they are, and then just say start from the beginning, when we reach each segment/section, then ask me to do that. That may be the only way of getting those fixed. I don't know if you understood the logic? Thanks. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 16:56, 12 July 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Czarking0, I will address all the concern, but please give me time. I will ping you when am done. Thanks.Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 19:50, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. |
| |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. |
Controversy section is a little iffy. Panama papers is the only thing in here. It could make sense to incorporate this into other sections. I recommend you come back to this point after addressing the others.
| |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. |
I am made some mention of citations that need publishers below. Other than that I have not found any issues yet. I have not been through them all and I will need to recheck if the coverage is expanded. | |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). |
I think a major question is are the sources reliable? I expect that a lot of these are used on several WP Nigeria pages but I am not familiar with them so if they are not on the WP:RSP then we should investigate each of them and demonstrate reliability. Here are the sources I'd like to see.
| |
2c. it contains no original research. |
My first analysis cannto find any but I will need to recheck if the coverage is expanded. | |
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. |
The author and I have discussed this. See previous GA and talk page for more details | |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. |
I think there are some significant coverage issues. However, I understand that there may not be the requisite sources to cover all these points. Here is what I think needs to be added:
| |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). |
The other issues are so significant, I can't really call something out here as out of scope. | |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. |
I would probably not pass this article as neutral in the current state. However, it is difficult to say since there is so little coverage. Neutrality concerns I have are: what did he do in office, why was he impeached. I think the percentage of this article that is devoted to panama papers is probably undue weight given how little info there is about anything else. | |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. |
I'd give this lukewarm pass. There are quite a few reverted edits. However given that several of those are from IP users and they don't defend their edits I'd let it go unless more issues are brought. | |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. |
| |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | ||
7. Overall assessment. |
I outlined a number of ways that this article should improve before assigning GA status. It has been a month with no movement so I am failing. |
- Thank you very much, @Czarking0. I'll include the sources and content into the article. However, due to the tables abve, I'm not sure how to respond to your comments. Perhaps you could do that in a discussion section. For instance, WP:THESUN is not linked at all to The Sun (Nigeria), and a list of reliable sources for such an article can be found in WP:NGRS. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 15:05, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for WP:NGRS I did not know about that. I have cross referenced my table with that one and marked the items need need additional attention as Not done Czarking0 (talk) 21:45, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
- ^ "Peter Obi shakes up the political class: The depth of the country's crises is forcing voters to rethink their choices - to the great benefit of the former governor of Anambra state". Africa Confidential. 63 (15): 4–6. 2022.