Talk:Peter L. Corsell

This article was nominated for deletion on 21 November 2013 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Espionage Low‑importance

	Peter L. Corsell is within the scope of WikiProject Espionage, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of espionage, intelligence, and related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, or contribute to the discussion.EspionageWikipedia:WikiProject EspionageTemplate:WikiProject EspionageEspionage articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Internet Low‑importance

	Internet portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

I would like to note that the new references that were added to the page after the original publication are independent and meet the WP:SECONDARY criteria, which was the only argument posted against this page. It seems as though additional publications that were secondary and well-known, high-profile, etc were added and thus show the significance of the references. The new references added overcome the original claim that the references were “trivial” and “lacked independence”.

Contested deletion

This page is not unambiguously promotional, and meets the full Wikipedia criteria for encyclopedic inclusion under WP:BIO and WP:BASIC. Note that the page was already discussed in the articles for deletion forum and was found to meet the Wikipedia notability and objectivity criteria for inclusion with reliable, independent citations. In addition you can see that a Wikipedia administrator (SarahStierch)also did a thorough review and edit of the page to ensure that it fully met Wikipedia guidelines for a neutral point of view and maintained its encyclopedic purpose. The content of the article was derived from multiple published sources and is factual and informative in nature. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EMSguru (talk • contribs) 17:16, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's ALL positive. Dark Sun (talk) 17:20, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There have been a substantial number of edits by multiple independent editors since the article's creation. I've read and re-read the content looking for any information that was not stated simply and factually, with clear citation of the source of the content, or that could be deemed to read as promotional and am not seeing specific content that could be objected to on those grounds. Having said that, any additional eyes are appreciated and if there is text that another editor feels needs to be modified I welcome the improvement of the article. EMSguru (talk) 02:01, 16 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]