Talk:Political repression of cyber-dissidents
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Index
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 100 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
English translation of Russian article about "Internet brigades"
[edit]Valid This translation was taken from La Russophobe
Link to original Russian texts:
Supressing content due to possible WP:COPYVIO --Kslotte (talk) 10:11, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
Original research by Biophys
[edit]Stomakhin and Rakhmankov were nor politcal bloggers, neither dissedents. Biophys classifiction of Rakhmankov and Stomakhin as dissident is original research too. I consider unilateral renaming of the page without any discussion by Biophys to be disruptive behaviour. Please, someone, take measures, because Biophys renames pages very regularly - see Operation Sarindar. Vlad fedorov 18:08, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
Split off the Internet brigades
[edit]The section on Russian Federation's Internet brigades does not really belong into this article, even though it's a tightly related topic. I have added the {{splitsection}} tag to it. However, I can't propose a good title for that article right now. Digwuren 12:42, 23 June 2007 (UTC)
- How does "Revelations of Tinfoil Hat" sound? I am not being entirely serious here, but article does smell of "hidden truths" extremely heavy. RJ CG
OF COURSE YOU WONDERFUL HONEST COLLECTIVE OF LIBERTARIAN FREEBOOTER MISFITS SHOW YOU WESTERN CULTURAL BIAS BY NO MENTION OF WESTERN OPPRESSION (E.G. THE UNTED STATES AND THE UNITED KINGDUMB) KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK WITH TRASH LIKE WHAT YOU WRITE WHO NEEDS DISHONEST PEOPLE YOU CAN BE BOTH! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.240.194.120 (talk) 20:10, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
Clearing/deletion of Russia/Tunisia
[edit]As for Russia it says that one man was fined for insulting /my guess/ Putin. Which doesn't make him to be dissident. It's also doesn't clearly states what for that man was fined, he was found guilty but, what his guilt was is unclear.
Another man was sad to be convicted "for publishing articles on the internet". And that's all. Yeah very important and complete information. Who knows may be he was publishing racistish articles.
Part about Tunisia also doesn't lists any details. So I'ill delete it if there will be no objection. I'm just lazy to read other parts of the article.--Oleg Str (talk) 13:09, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
- I have a question. Whether fining incivil journalist for public offensive language and conviction of clearly extreme hate speech blogger is "political represion"? Definitely POV pushing and simply doesn't belong here. Vlad fedorov (talk) 17:41, 27 March 2010 (UTC)
- Hate speech and defamation are either crimes or misdemeanors in all countries.Vlad fedorov (talk) 07:43, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Political repression of cyber-dissidents. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070217212454/http://web.amnesty.org/pages/vnm-221006-action-eng to http://web.amnesty.org/pages/vnm-221006-action-eng
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:51, 22 February 2016 (UTC)