Talk:Perpetual count

	Hungary portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hungary, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hungary on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HungaryWikipedia:WikiProject HungaryTemplate:WikiProject HungaryHungary articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Slovakia

	Slovakia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Slovakia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Slovakia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SlovakiaWikipedia:WikiProject SlovakiaTemplate:WikiProject SlovakiaSlovakia articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Croatia Low‑importance

	Croatia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Croatia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Croatia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CroatiaWikipedia:WikiProject CroatiaTemplate:WikiProject CroatiaCroatia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Romania

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Romania, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Romania-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RomaniaWikipedia:WikiProject RomaniaTemplate:WikiProject RomaniaRomania articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests :
- Help Romania reach at least GA-status
- Help History of Romania get WP:GOOD
- Request an article or create a missing one
Assess :
- Assess all articles tagged for this project that have not been assessed for quality
Cleanup :
- Review the Romania-related cleanup listing
- Normalize the use of "Northern Bukovina" (capitalized) and "Northern Bessarabia" (Bessarabian part of Chernivtsi Oblast) all over Wikipedia
Disambiguation :
- Disambiguate project articles and get points
Expand :
- Expand Postage stamps and postal history of Romania
Translate :
- Translate Romania-related articles from the Romanian Wikipedia
- Translate and keep in sync with the project versions in other languages: Projet:Roumanie (in French), Proiect:România (in Romanian), Проект:Румыния (in Russian)
Unreferenced : * Add more reference to FC CFR Timișoara.
Other :
- Make use in articles of the newly contributed images (about 5800!!) from the Wiki Loves Monuments Romania 2011 (WLM Romania external site)
- Review newly created Romania-related articles
- Check the articles needing expert attention or other work, and help with some of the items
- Create Awards for WikiProject Romania
- Contribute photos related to Romania at Commons:WikiProject Romania. Organize Romania related images on Commons. See also media-related tasks

Title

User:Borsoka, don't you think that this article should be renamed to the title "perpetual count", per google books results [1]? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.117.169.57 (talk) 18:46, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You may be right. My only concern is that the google books result do not refer to the institution of perpetual ispáns, but to the title of Hunyadi (which is, of course, connected to the institution). Borsoka (talk) 03:06, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

@User:Borsoka - The title perpetual count of Beszterce is not the only one that appears in sources. I also found Perpetual count of Zagorje, perpetual count of Teocak and Perpetual Count of the Gefpanchaft of Gran (this source is a little old, but still) 79.117.176.6 (talk) 06:37, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I still maintain that all the referred sources make mention of a title, not of the institution. However, I agree that the usage should be checqued. Borsoka (talk) 06:41, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand the difference 79.117.176.6 (talk) 06:47, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 06:19, 5 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Perpetual ispán → Perpetual count – The current title was fabricated by User:Borsoka and isn't used by any authors (0 Google Books results). The word ispán is just the Hungarian word for count is ([2]). There are 43 Google Books sources that use this formula 79.117.175.101 (talk) 06:24, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Although it is not so evident, as the anonymous user suggests (many of the sources mentioned above use the title "ispán" instead of "count" when referring to the non-hereditary heads of counties in the Kingdom of Hungary, and in Hungarian the title is the same for hereditary and non-hereditary holders of this office), but for the time being there is no reliable source substantiating the use of the expression "perpetual ispán" in English sources. Borsoka (talk) 06:50, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support, per GB results. However, Borsoka has right, "ispán" (comes) was not a hereditary title for aristocracy, the latter (count; gróf) appeared in Hungary for the first time in the Late Middle Ages (see e. g. Szentgyörgyi family, Counts of Szentgyörgy and Bazin)--Norden1990 (talk) 00:29, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support per GB results and user Borsoka. In ictu oculi (talk) 02:32, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support. No reason to use foreign language words if they can be translated in a straightforward manner. Ich weiß dass nicht (talk) 14:13, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.