Talk:Penafiel Palace

Portugal Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Portugal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Portugal on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PortugalWikipedia:WikiProject PortugalTemplate:WikiProject PortugalPortugal articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Portugal To-do:

Find correct name The airport is not listed as João Paulo II anywhere. The airport's own website calls itself simply Ponta Delgada, and has no mention of João Paulo.

Improve key articles to Good article

Improve

Review

Category:History of Portugal: lots to remove there
Template:Regions of Portugal: statistical (NUTS3) subregions and intercommunal entities are confused; they are not the same in all regions, and should be sublisted separately in each region: intermunicipal entities are sometimes larger and split by subregions (e.g. the Metropolitan Area of Lisbon has two subregions), some intercommunal entities are containing only parts of subregions. All subregions should be listed explicitly and not assume they are only intermunicipal entities (which accessorily are not statistic subdivisions but real administrative entities, so they should be listed below, probably using a smaller font: we can safely eliminate the subgrouping by type of intermunicipal entity from this box).

Requests

See Requested articles

Assess

Help assessing articles.

Need images

Translate from Portuguese Wikipedia

Wikify

Vote:

Watch this list — Edit this list

Architecture: Historic houses Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Historic houses task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Merge

Correio-Mor Palace An article on the exact topic has already existed for >5 yrs. This article is better than that one, however, after checking the version history of that article it's plain that the issue of naming has already been discussed at length. In addition, the Portuguese article is already linked to the other one, so I think the text of this article should be placed over there, then this article be made to redirect there.

--- Ultracobalt (talk) 11:05, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your interest into these two articles, but I am regretted to say that the two articles are of two different palaces. The other Correiro-Mor Palace article is on the palace in Loures and this article is on the palace in Lisbon. While they are similarly named, and were owned by the same family of High-Couriers, they are seperate palaces and thus articles. Thank you, Cristiano Tomás (talk) 16:13, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Per our colleagues request to merge this Correio-Mor Palace article into the Palace of the Counts of Penafiel, it should be rejected, as there are three Correrio-Mor Palaces in Portugal. In fact, this article created by User:Cristiano Tomás refers to the Correio-Mor Palace in Madalena (the referred to Palace of the Counts of Penafiel), while the article Correio-Mor Palace is located in the municipality of Loures (two different animals altogether). Alternately, there is the third Correio-Mor Palace inSanta Maria de Belém. I refer to the Portuguese SIPA Architectural Database to specify and explain these differences located:[1]. Consequently, I do not support the intention to merge these articles. ^{ruben jc}ZEORYMER (talk) 22:09, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I agree and withdraw my request. However, it would be useful if the author could put in coordinates and the correct inline references to avoid confusion. I see you did put in a link to the other one in "see also" - that helps. With 3 of these, a disambiguation page is probably needed also. Thanks. Ultracobalt (talk) 23:49, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Well confusion wouldn't occur if one just read the first lines of each article and saw that they were in different cities. Thank you, Cristiano Tomás (talk) 00:57, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]