Talk:Peak Time

Korea Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Internet culture Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles
Expand : Pick an article from here or here
Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images
Stubs : All stubs are located here
Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}}
- See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

Page organization

Hello, I have a few things in mind that I want to impart to my fellow Wikipedians who are actively working on this page. I thought this route is better so that people know where I am coming from, when I edit, and avoid WP:EW.

I firmly believe that the Production section should come after the Lead section, as it provides some background information on the series, similar to Big Brother 11 (American season), which is currently considered a WP:GA. At least for now, until we further expand the page.
The Broadcast section could be added under the Production section as a subsection. Another thing, as per WP:NOTTVGUIDE, I don't think we should mention the time slot, unless it's notable or highly significant.
I am unsure about the 1-member Team subsection. I guess, what bothers me about it is that it's presented as a table. I think it's better if it's written out as a paragraph instead. The position column I think is unnecessary.

Just wondering what the others think. Thank you. Eugh jei ♥ Kaorin 09:20, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Eugh jei: thanks for the suggestion. I'm the who moved Production section and feel free to re-move it and edit the other things you suggest. — 9️⃣8️⃣🐯♒️•(🆃🅰🅻🅺) 09:28, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Noted! Eugh jei ♥ Kaorin 09:35, 24 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Suspicion of contestant's school violence

Here's the article link. Should we add this under Reception section after JTBC release their statement whether a fact or groundless? — 9️⃣8️⃣🐯♒️ • (🆃🅰🅻🅺) 12:13, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oh wow. I was just thinking that if ever there's a controversy, it should be placed under Reception. So, yes please do so. And maybe under a controversy subsection? — Eugh jei ♥ Kaorin 13:46, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah noted on that. — 9️⃣8️⃣🐯♒️ • (🆃🅰🅻🅺) 14:09, 6 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Now that this is concluded with the person involved leaving the show (here), I am still reluctant to write a whole section about this in this article. I feel that a sentence or two, or maybe even a paragraph, under Contestants would suffice. It's a Kim Hyun-jae controversy and not a Peak Time controversy, if that makes any sense. Just wondering what my fellow editors think about this. — Eugh jei ♥ Kaorin 10:19, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I agree to put it under Contestants section. — 9️⃣8️⃣🐯♒️ • (🆃🅰🅻🅺) 11:53, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Debut year

Any thoughts on the debut year info under Contestants? I am on the fence about it but leaning towards not including it. — Eugh jei ♥ Kaorin 23:32, 18 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would also lean towards not including it as the majority of groups listed there already have a Wikipedia article with their debut year anyway. As for the rest, the debut year is listed in the table right underneath, which is easier to read than cluttering the "contestants" section with the dates. RueNightshade (talk) 00:41, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the input. For clarification, I was referring to the debut year info written in the narrative and in the table. I am for removal of it completely. Though I do see why one would want to see the debut years of the listed teams in the table. — Eugh jei ♥ Kaorin 01:10, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Just wondering if anyone has input regarding this before I proceed with the removal of the years in the prose, but not on the table. Thank you. — Eugh jei ♥ Kaorin 12:02, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think no one's disagree with your suggestion and just be bold. 9️⃣8️⃣🐯♒️ 13:13, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I think you can go ahead with it. I also personally don't mind if you remove the debut years from the table, too. — wanna be your star, 루입니다 ★ 15:26, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Done. — Eugh jei ♥ Kaorin 00:13, 24 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Tables

I've been wondering since the union match ended. I feel that we need to do something about the tables because they are affecting the readability of the article, as per WP:NOTSTATS. It's either simplify them, which I plan to do on the unit match results table, for example, not include them at all, or write it out as a prose. — Eugh jei ♥ Kaorin 12:59, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest to remove the Team and Member column then add the MVP under the score on Result column.

Like this:

♯ || Alliance || Song || Results

9️⃣8️⃣🐯♒️ 13:17, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Private life controversy

A contestant was embroiled about partying with some Japanese AV actresses and netizens speculated that the person involved is Karam of Team 23:00. 9️⃣8️⃣🐯♒️ 02:52, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm... if the member involved gets removed from the show because of this, then we address it here. We'll see what Peak Time producers will say about it. Otherwise, this info will have to go to the group's Wikipedia article, whomever this is. — Eugh jei ♥ Kaorin 08:44, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Update: Production team released a statement that Team 23:00 departed from the show.