User talk:RueNightshade

March 2023

Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in List of Boys Planet contestants. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. I'm referring to section titles. You have a Professional Editor Userbox but it says otherwise. — 9️⃣8️⃣🐯♒️•(🆃🅰🅻🅺) 02:43, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am aware that section titles should not be written in title case. However, please note that that there is an exception for proper names (which the mission titles are, hence why I capitalized them accordingly), as stated here:

Use sentence case, not title case, capitalization in all section headings. Capitalize the first character of the first element if it is a letter, but leave the rest lower case except for proper names and other items that would ordinarily be capitalized in running text. (MOS)

Furthermore, other survival show articles use the same formatting of capitalizing the mission names within the text and in the section headings, see Girls Planet 999 and the entire Produce 101 franchise. So it is neither unprecedented, nor unusual or inherently incorrect.

Also please note that my Professional Editor Userbox is a general userbox for professions, not one referring specifically to my status on Wikipedia; it refers to my real-life profession. I also do not appreciate you questioning my professionality based on such a small matter; you simply could have left said statement out as it is neither constructive nor relevant to the discussion. RueNightshade (talk) 07:54, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Lightoil (talk) 00:14, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that, it really is something I tend to forget and am trying to fill out more often. Thanks for reminding me of checking that setting. Have a nice day! wanna be your star, 루입니다 ★ 11:58, 23 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I see you have a history of breaching the MoS

Beware, I will take action if you revert my fixes to that article—that bring it into compliance with common practice AND the Manual of Style. Tony (talk) 03:21, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

First off, I don't have a history of breaching the MOS. The other entry on my talk page by Tigerius98 ended up being a mistake on their part, which you could easily see if you checked the page in question and saw that my edit (the capitalized version of the section headers) has been adopted since. Your "fixes" were also neither compliant with common practice nor the MOS. To my knowledge, there is no part of the MOS that says that references in tables aren't allowed to have a space before them or that everything needs to be linked to when it has an article each time it is mentioned, regardless of whether it already has been linked to shortly beforehand. It's also not common practice — I can list an abundance of articles that use the same formatting I did. This is simply nitpicking based on personal preference, not a "fix" or breach of MOS. I won't revert your edit again as I don't want to engage in an edit war but I also do not agree with you and also do not care to further discuss this with you. — wanna be your star, 루입니다 ★ 21:16, 17 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Astro (South Korean band)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Astro (South Korean band), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 21:37, 19 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Help at the Ancient Greek Wikipedia

Hi! How are you? I have noticed that you say in your user page that you speak Ancient Greek and I was wondering whether you could possibly help us revive the Ancient Greek Wikipedia at the Incubator. It would be great if you could lend us a helping hand. Jon Gua (talk) 14:23, 11 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! I am sorry to bother you again but I was wondering whether you could possibly sign this (https://shorturl.at/hNQVY) petition in order to get the Wikipedia in Ancient Greek approved. Thank you so much for your help. Jon Gua (talk) 07:15, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]