Talk:Paxus Calta

The following Wikipedia contributor may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Paxuscalta (talk · contribs) / Calta, Paxus This user has contributed to the article.

This article was nominated for deletion on 13 January 2007. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Urban studies and planning

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Urban studies and planning, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Urban studies and planning on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Urban studies and planningWikipedia:WikiProject Urban studies and planningTemplate:WikiProject Urban studies and planningUrban studies and planning articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Clean up of article

I've tried to remove the weasel words and add some references. I am not sure I have the reference format correct, in fact since they are slightly different from each other I am sure they should be corrected. Saratansey (talk) 08:00, 27 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Still Problematic

This BLP continues to have major concerns that must be addressed, specifically:

Lots of statements are entirely unsourced and will have to be removed if sources cannot be found, for example the alternative parenting situation that is asserted. In fact, most of the "sources" are web flotsam and not WP:RS at all
Notability is still an issue – most of the "sources" do not go toward it at all, e.g. his unfinished, unpublished pamphlet and the videos that spotlight the Twin Oaks Community (in which Calta appears briefly, along with many other folks). The Fox news article does discuss him briefly in light of an arrest, but without other sources, this isn't much more than WP:1E.

I've re-tagged the page in this regard. I'm hoping this will stir some activity by others towards resolving these issues, because I haven't come up with much more than what is here. Respectfully, Agricola44 (talk) 19:48, 11 October 2010 (UTC).[reply]

I added three more recent media references for Calta. Calta is a spokesperson for a new anti-nuclear group which is getting press attention. There are more i could add. Saratansey (talk) 05:43, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Gobonobo removed tags without explanation and without addressing the issues above (although the parenting situation was later resolved by another ed). However, they are still unresolved, for example almost all the details in the biography section are unsourced (WP:BLP vio) and notability is far from apparent. I've now replaced these tags. Please do not removed them without first addressing these issues. Thanks, Agricola44 (talk) 15:02, 19 October 2010 (UTC).[reply]

Johnny Squeaky removed the notability tag without resolution of these problems, but rather under the mistaken assumption of some sort of statute of limitations. It is starting to look like no resolution will be forthcoming, so perhaps it is getting close to letting the community decide via AfD. Comments? Thanks, Agricola44 (talk) 15:36, 6 September 2011 (UTC).[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Paxus Calta. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20060714080721/http://www.zhaba.cz:80/uploads/media/Shared_Path.pdf to http://www.zhaba.cz/uploads/media/Shared_Path.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:31, 2 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This article is written by its subject

It seems problematic that Paxus Calta himself has aparently created and edited this article - seems like a conflict of interest and goes against wikipedia recommendations. Wonder if it's worth starting from scratch here and just get the information available in secondary sources. 82.26.250.60 (talk) 17:48, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Users Saratansey also appears to be associated with Paxuscalta as they have similar background in the anti-nuclear movement. Additionally, on further inspection of the article, some of the more recent edits have a promotional tone. 82.26.250.60 (talk) 17:57, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]