Jump to content

Talk:Pauline Green

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineePauline Green was a Social sciences and society good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 30, 2007Peer reviewReviewed
November 29, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed
July 30, 2008Good article nomineeNot listed
Current status: Former good article nominee

Comments on Peer Review and GA nom Fail

[edit]
  • Wow, the Peer review attracted no commentary whatsoever other than an automated response. That throws the validity of the review into question.
  • This article really needs very close re-reading, perhaps from WP:LoCE. As it stands at this precise moment, I could not pass it for GA... forex, there was orgininally no explanation of what santer is (I fixed it) .. and there are many grammatical errors such as confusing "contributed to" with "was attributed to" (I fixed it), spelling en masse incorrectly (I fixed that too), and this grammatical error (which i did not fix): " She was working in the West Hampstead division that she met and married PC Paul Green in 1971".
  • Many problems with dashes, see WP:MOSDASH
  • It could benefit from named refs... I did one for you ("The perils of Pauline")
  • You really need to check the licensing of the images.. for example, you can't copyright something and release it under GFDL at the same time, as is the case for Image:PaulineGreen20050423 CopyrightKaihsuTai.jpg. The two licenses are mutually exclusive!
  • Drop me a line if you have questions. If you believe this review was done inappropriately or dispute its conclusion, you can list the article at WP:GAR.
  • Ling.Nut (talk) 10:40, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I've checked the wikimedia Commons page of the user who uploaded the photograph of Pauline Green used in this article: their explanation of the GDFL/copyright situation is:

"It's confusing, but technically correct: having the copyright for a work is actually necessary for releasing it under a free license (or any license). If you do not have the copyright, you can't license it. "Copyleft" worls like this: I reserve all rights, and then grant everyone a lot of rights under a few conditions. If I would disclaim the copyright, I could not tell anyone the I want to be mentioned as the author, etc." —Preceding unsigned comment added by JonStrines (talk • contribs) 09:31, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Introduced the nasmed references where appropriate. Not doing anything with the dashes, as these seem consistent with the style guide quoted - specifically "Spaced en dashes – such as here – can be used instead of unspaced em dashes in all of the ways discussed above. Spaced en dashes are used by several major publishers, to the complete exclusion of em dashes; style manuals more often prefer unspaced em dashes. One style should be used consistently in an article." JonStrines (talk) 11:48, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Automated peer review

[edit]

The following suggestions were generated by a semi-automatic javascript program, and might not be applicable for the article in question.

You may wish to browse through User:AndyZ/Suggestions for further ideas. Thanks, Tom (talk) 15:26, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Pauline Green. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:34, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Pauline Green. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:18, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Pauline Green. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:27, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on Pauline Green. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:41, 9 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Pauline_Green&oldid=1207429799"