Talk:Paul von Werner/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Gog the Mild (talk · contribs) 09:25, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Auntieruth55. Just checking that you have spotted my comments below. Gog the Mild (talk) 20:50, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have copy edited. Let me know of anything you aren't happy with. good
"which was to resume the fortress of Kołobrzeg but had hardly any supplies". This doesn't make much sense to me. Is "resume" a typo? fixed. Resume the siege
There is a shortage of pictures. How about one of the equestrian statue of Frederick the Great, even if it doesn't show Werner's name?
There are missing publisher locations, OCLCs and ISBNs missing in the sources. locations etc added. OCLCs not available for Bucheim, too old. Gog the Mild (talk) 17:33, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Kronoskaf does not strike me as a WP:RS. It seems to be an open wiki type project. It claims to be based on König, A .B.: Biographisches Lexikon aller Helden und Militärpersonen welche sich in preussischen Diensten berühmt gemacht haben, Vol. IV. Berlin 1791. It would be preferable to draw information direct from that, which is a RS. actually, it is. It's well researched and carefully written. but I changed the source

@Auntieruth55: That's a lot of edits since I last looked at it. It reads better now. Another sterling piece of work to add to your oeuvre. I don't know how you do it. Gog the Mild (talk) 08:30, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed