Talk:Paul von Werner

Paul von Werner has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: August 6, 2018. (Reviewed version).

Biography: Military

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the military biography work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Germany: Prussia Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Prussia, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.

Military history: Biography / European / German / Early Modern

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Military biography task force
	European military history task force
	German military history task force
	Early Modern warfare task force (c. 1500 – c. 1800)

This article was created or improved during WikiProject Europe's "European 10,000 Challenge", which started on November 1, 2016, and is ongoing. You can help out!

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Paul von Werner/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Gog the Mild (talk · contribs) 09:25, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Auntieruth55. Just checking that you have spotted my comments below. Gog the Mild (talk) 20:50, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have copy edited. Let me know of anything you aren't happy with. good
"which was to resume the fortress of Kołobrzeg but had hardly any supplies". This doesn't make much sense to me. Is "resume" a typo? fixed. Resume the siege
There is a shortage of pictures. How about one of the equestrian statue of Frederick the Great, even if it doesn't show Werner's name?
There are missing publisher locations, OCLCs and ISBNs missing in the sources. locations etc added. OCLCs not available for Bucheim, too old. Gog the Mild (talk) 17:33, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Kronoskaf does not strike me as a WP:RS. It seems to be an open wiki type project. It claims to be based on König, A .B.: Biographisches Lexikon aller Helden und Militärpersonen welche sich in preussischen Diensten berühmt gemacht haben, Vol. IV. Berlin 1791. It would be preferable to draw information direct from that, which is a RS. actually, it is. It's well researched and carefully written. but I changed the source

Gog the Mild (talk) 17:49, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Gog the Mild done....auntieruth (talk) 22:58, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Auntieruth55: That's a lot of edits since I last looked at it. It reads better now. Another sterling piece of work to add to your oeuvre. I don't know how you do it. Gog the Mild (talk) 08:30, 6 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box

Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()

3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()

Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed