Talk:Paul Caulford

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Toronto Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Toronto, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Toronto on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TorontoWikipedia:WikiProject TorontoTemplate:WikiProject TorontoToronto articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Change of page to redirect

Hi User:Onel5969 you deleted the page and made it a redirect. How would you feel about reverting that decision and seeking a second opinion or seeking consensus? I'm open minded to this outcome, but I'd prefer to have had the chance to discuss, yet it's not so easy to discuss now that you deleted all the content. CT55555 (talk) 13:41, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, I don't have an issue with it. I've restored it and tagged it for notability, letting another reviewer take a shot. I would suggest you find more in-depth coverage of him, since all the current coverage is about the center (which btw, I marked as reviewed). Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:21, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I appreciate this. I recognize a lot of the sources are primary, but I thought it passed GNG. I'll reassess that perception in the next few days. I do appreciate that you went for the redirect rather than the AfD and your openness to discuss. I'll try to improve it in the short term. CT55555 (talk) 14:24, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi CT55555 - there's really been no improvement since the above, and right now it does not appear to meet GNG. Would you prefer I redirect it again, or send it to AfD? Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:46, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm apologize, I neglected this until your prompt. I've spent some time finding more information about him and added it, notably:

Talk about him in a book that was published last month!
Awards he has been given (some are solid, some are not so much, but I included both)
Papers he has published that have been used to inform other academic papers, I only included ones where there was widespread influence
Content about his work during the SARS epidemic

I hope this will satisfies you that he meets GNG. If it does not please say and I will see if there is more I can do. If you feel compelled to urgently make a AfD or merge decision, I would favour an AfD. Thank you for asking and for giving me the time to make changes. CT55555 (talk) 16:03, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]