Jump to content

Talk:Patrick White/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Birthdate

According to this he was born on May 28, not May 18.

Thanks for pointing this out; his autobiography also mentions May 28. Fixed the article. Lupo 07:07, 28 May 2004 (UTC)
Sorry, must've been a typo. Does anyone have a public domain picture of White? Ambivalenthysteria 08:48, 28 May 2004 (UTC)

Un-Australian?

his books were largely ignored in Australia (three of them having been called ‘un-Australian’ by critics

Which books? Citation?

Proudly un-Australian, Singkong2005 23:32, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

Dunno; does it matter? Unsure what the word really means, beyond its manipulative, nationalistic agenda. Tony 23:36, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

Articles needed

Unfortunate to see only two or three of his works have pages. Maybe we could get started on Tree of Man, Aun't Story, Fringe of Leaves sometime?

Oops,

Of course I didn't add Women Writers cat, I added Writers from NSW cat, but let wrong edit summary drop in! ... Sterry2607 13:43, 14 September 2007 (UTC)

infoblot

I propose that the infobox be removed. The information is (or should be) also in the main text. It compartmentalises information and creates POV over its prioriy ("Domestic partner" is a put-down term, and who are we to say that it's important enough to elevate to the very top of the article? Tony (talk) 01:38, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

Twentieth anniversary of the great man's death is coming up

September 2010. I wonder whether there's any interest in working this up to featured status and applying for main-page exposure on the day? I'll post at other relevant pages, too. I could assist, but I'd do it only as a team-member.  :-) Tony (talk) 04:18, 26 May 2010 (UTC)

pic of him

Well thank god someone has put one there. I'm not sure it will stick in copyright terms, but it certainly lifts the article and is important for the readers' understanding. I have had no success in getting the ABC or the Australian National Library to release or locate a copyright-free image of the man. The ABC, which runs the most comprehensive site on White, said fine, if an annual fee is paid (I'm not paying out of my own pocket). It's extraordinary that national cultural institutions are so unwilling to assist, given White's importance to Australian culture. Tony (talk) 08:20, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Order of Australia

Did Patrick receive the Order of Australia? Did he renounce the honour later on, when the government started to give out knighthoods in the Order? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.239.146.64 (talk) 13:19, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

There's no listing at It's an Honour for him. That in itself doesn't mean he didn't get an award, because some winners choose not to permit their awards to be listed there. Nor does it mean that he was offered one but declined it. Or that he accepted one but later renounced it. But there's no mention of anything like this in Marr's biography, and fwiw I've never heard of any awards even being offered, let alone declined.
All I can say is that it would be very surprising if a man of his stature wasn't at least offered an AC. Maybe one was offered and he said no, thanks but it's never made the news. He wasn't one for feeding the press with personal information. -- ♬ Jack of Oz[your turn] 20:04, 27 May 2012 (UTC)
Patrick White was awarded the Companion of the Order of Australia in 1975, but resigned from the Order the year after. He was also offered a knighthood prior to that. I don't know whether somebody is allowed to unilaterally renounce an Order of Australia award. If the Order of Australia is like the British orders (ie, Order the British Empire, etc), the recipient can't unilaterally renounce an award once it is granted and accepted by the recipient. So it might be correct to list an AC as his postnominal, even though he renounced it. The fact that there is no listing for him at It's an Honour would have no effect whether or not he still actually has the AC award, or the postnominal.

http://adb.anu.edu.au/biography/white-patrick-victor-14925 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 219.90.200.150 (talk) 11:27, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Both Patrick White & Nugget Coombs were in the group of 6 awarded the first civil (now called general) ACs in the Queen's Birthday Honours List 1975.
They both resigned from the order in 1976 when the AK was created - see
I haven't yet located the gazette entries for their resignations.
As they both resigned, from that point neither of them were ACs, and hence no-one else is entitled to call them ACs, and hence neither appear in "It's an Honour". Pdfpdf (talk) 10:00, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
Obviously I hadn't checked the Marr biography very well in May 2012 (above), because it's there alright: Around 1970 he'd declined the offer of a knighthood (p. 516). Then in early 1975 he was invited to dinner at Jim McClelland's house, and Sir John Kerr was also there. Earlier in the year, he'd been offered a Companion of the Order but had neither accepted nor rejected it at this time. At one point in the evening, Kerr took White aside and told him it was really important that such a notable figure should be associated with the Order from the outset. That made White's mind up (p. 554). Then he quit the Order some time after 11 November 1975 (p. 578). Marr makes no mention of it having anything to do with the new level of knighthood that Fraser introduced. He's quoted as saying to Geoffrey Dutton at the time All such honours are bribes, and all honours are political ... Thinking as I do, I shall get on with my dreadful fate of being an Australian, but at least without the irrelevant baubles. White attributed his change of heart to his disillusion over Whitlam's performance as PM, not to anything Fraser did. -- Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 11:20, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
Very interesting! It seems that finding the resignation dates of the two of them becomes more important, because
  • It indicates whether they did it in tandem or independently
  • It indicates what they did it in response to - i.e. the dismissal, the announcement of knighthoods, and/or other factors.
I find it interesting that Elizabeth Webby (who wrote the ADB entry and quotes Marr as a reference) presents a slightly different view to Marr.
Cheers, and thanks, Pdfpdf (talk) 12:56, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
It was reported on 11 June 1976 that Nugget Coombs had resigned from the Order on 3 June 1976, specifically because of the introduction of knighthoods. That is clear.
On 22 June 1976, Government House refused to comment on reports that Patrick White had resigned from the Order. I wouldn't normally place much store in this sort of thing, but it says he resigned on 18 June 1976, which would square nicely with the foregoing. As to the reason(s) for White's resignation, here are White's own words, containing no reference to knighthoods. It was solely about "the sacking of the elected government".
It seems to me that White unintentionally contributed to the confusion here. He resigned AFTER the introduction of knighthoods, but, according to his own words, not BECAUSE of the introduction of knighthoods. He could have resigned months earlier, any time from 12 November 1975, but chose to wait for 7 months to manifest his outrage. Because his resignation came at much the same time that Coombs resigned, commentators have generally made a link they weren't entitled to make, but an understandable one nonetheless, and they now say both men's reasons were the same. But that seems not to be the case.
This, BTW, says that two other people resigned in 1976 after Fraser introduced knighthoods. I wonder who they were. I'd be surprised if they were also Companions. -- Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 02:19, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Patrick White. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 13:14, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Patrick White. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:08, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Patrick White. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:15, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Error in kindergarten sentence

'At the age of five, he attended kindergarten at Sandtoft in Woollahra, on Sydney's North Shore.[6]'. Could someone please check the reference [6]? Woollahra is in the Eastern Suburbs and not on the North Shore. North Shore suburbs beginning with W are Wahroonga, Warriewood, Wollstonecraft.... MargaretRDonald (talk) 23:45, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for pointing out the error. As a former Sydney-sider, I can confirm Woollahra is where Sandtoft was located and Woollahra is in Sydney's eastern suburbs.--Chewings72 (talk) 00:07, 27 January 2018 (UTC)

Patrick White was gay?

According to this website, he was gay: http://thestockholmshelf.com/tag/gay-nobel-laureates/ If true, it should be mentioned in this article. It would mean he is the world's only gay Nobel laureate, ad of April 2018. Engineering Guy (talk) 21:30, 17 April 2018 (UTC) Engineering Guy (talk) 21:30, 17 April 2018 (UTC)

So you see "gay" and "straight" as binary labels? And you have a list of where each Nobel Laureate fell on some kind of spectrum? Tony (talk) 02:11, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Search the article for words such as "sex", "gay" etc, and you'll find plenty of mentions of his sexual orientation. Plus his partner was a male, Manoly Lascaris. Plus various LGBT categories. It's all there.
About being the only gay Nobel laureate: I'd find that very difficult to believe, but maybe you can find a convincing source. -- Jack of Oz [pleasantries] 02:21, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Just for the record, he was certainly not the only one. There are a couple more who are known to have been gay, such as Thomas Mann and André Gide.188.150.70.76 (talk) 23:03, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

Critical response

It is mentioned more than once in this article that critical response to White's writing in Australia was negative, while overseas he was acclaimed. Would it not improve this entry to include a section that sets out, with references, those criticisms, positive and negative? It could detail who made them, when, and in which publications, and reveal whether those critics changed their response over time. White was a controversial writer and his reception should be discussed here. Australian literature is not my area...an editor with expertise in that subject could make a valuable contribution here, particularly as there is now a significant body of scholarship on White's oeuvre. Jamesmcardle(talk) 06:40, 13 March 2022 (UTC)

Australian writer

Hello all

I have changed the short description and first sentence of the lead to simply "Australian writer". He was an Australian citizen. All reliable sources describe him as an Australian writer and he described himself so. He was born in England because his Australian parents happened to be visiting there at the time. They returned to Australia when he was six-months old. See policy: "Similarly, neither previous nationalities nor the country of birth should be mentioned in the opening paragraph unless relevant to the subject's notability." MOS:CITIZEN

Happy to discuss Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 06:35, 27 July 2024 (UTC)

Makes complete sense @Aemilius Adolphin, I support the change you've made. MatthewDalhousie (talk) 07:21, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
Support. Thanks! The Cardigan Kid (talk) 06:08, 30 July 2024 (UTC)

Military stuff given such prominence?

I think White in his later life would have been appalled at the appearance of that military "allegiance" and what he called "flag-wagging" in the infobox. I'm minded to remove it. Tony (talk) 00:34, 7 October 2022 (UTC)

I'm inclined to agree. I don't so much mind White's personal objection (this is an encyclopedia, after all), but I looked at the pages of a few authors whom I know to have served - e.e. cummings, Barbara Pym, C.S. Lewis and J.D. Salinger - none of whom have that in their infobox. It's relevant to his overall life story but not in any way to his notability. The Cardigan Kid (talk) 06:11, 9 October 2022 (UTC)

I have removed it. The info box is supposed to record key facts. See Wikipedia:INFOBOXPURPOSE. White's notability was as a writer, not for his war service which he doesn't even write about in his fiction. Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 06:28, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

Critical reception

Hello all

I have added a section on the critical reception of White's work. Given that White's notability is as a writer, I don't think there is enough attention to his work in the article. I have also added a sources section.

Happy to discuss Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 05:18, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

Themes and style

Hello all

I have added a section on the themes and style of White's work. I think this produces a better balance in the article's coverage of White's life and work.

Happy to discuss. Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 05:24, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

Lead

Hello all

I have significantly expanded the lead to take account of the new content and to better summarise the article. See Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section

Happy to discuss Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 05:37, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

Citation style

Hello all

The article uses various citation styles which results in confusion. If there are no objections, I intend to progressively move to the short footnote (sfnp) style which is one of the simplest and most commonly used. I will also tidy up the Further Reading section which doesn't use a consistent format and looks messy.

Happy to discuss Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 06:01, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

Info box

Hello all

I have removed the content about White's military service from the info box in accordance with the discussion above. I have also cut the notable works to a few and removed the link to the "List of Works" section which policy does not recommend Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Infoboxes.

Happy to discuss, particularly if you think other notable works should be mentioned. Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 06:32, 3 August 2024 (UTC)

Legacy

Hello all

I have expanded this section and changed the heading to "Influence and Legacy". I have combined it with the former section "Commemoration" which was about one garden named after White. I have used more concise wording and have added reliable sources for previously unsourced material. I have tried to make the section an overview of White's legacy and continued influence rather than a random collection of dated news items.

Happy to discuss Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 05:12, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

Awards and honours

Hello all

I have expanded the list of awards White received. I have presented the information more concisely and have removed some editorial comment about the reason White resigned from the Order of Australia which is discussed elsewhere in the article.

Happy to discuss Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 23:01, 4 August 2024 (UTC)

Religious and political views

Hello all

I have changed the heading Private Life to Religious and Political views as this better reflects the content. I have expanded the content and changed some of the wording of existing content to more accurately reflect the cited sources. I have moved content about religious themes in White's writing to the themes and style section where it more logically belongs.

Happy to discuss. Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 03:27, 6 August 2024 (UTC)