This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles
WP:BLP requires the deletion of unsourced derogatory information about a living person. But the deletions here do not appear to be of derogatory information. Tagging the information for citation seems thoroughly justified. Deleting it outright seems, to me at least, less so. Do others have an opinion about this? David in DC (talk) 01:44, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
BLP requires reliable sourcing for all content. Unsourced content, especially when derogatory, should be removed. The information I removed seemed to be 1) less likely to appear in reliable coverage and 2) unencyclopedic in that it presented excessive detail on rather insignificant information, given the subject's notability. See also WP:FART. If you'd like to replace some of it and mark it as needing cites, I won't dispute. But the majority of the article was simply unsourced, which is unacceptable. JFHJr (㊟) 04:36, 27 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
