Talk:Pasadena (disambiguation)

I believe that when one types in 'Pasadena' that they should be given an option where to go... not to default to Pasadena, Ca. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Terryrandell (talk • contribs) 03:32, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 18 September 2016

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: RM reached rough consensus for the move. Performed as requested (non-admin closure) — Andy W. (talk · ctb) 04:27, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pasadena → Pasadena (disambiguation) – WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT "Pasadena" most commonly refers to Pasadena, California. Pasadena, CA is ~~the most populous city if its name,~~ and of cultural and scientific significance, being site of the Rose Bowl, NASA's Jet Propulsion Lab, and Caltech. There are also several US Navy vessels named after it and a tv show. (edit: I stand corrected, thanks) Prisencolin (talk) 17:05, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. The California city gets an overwhelming percentage of the page views compared to the other Pasadenas [1]. Calidum ¤ 03:15, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Don't tell anyone from the more populous Pasadena, Texas. — AjaxSmack 13:50, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per above. Not more significant than the Texas city. Taylor Trescott - ^{my talk} + _{my edits} 14:52, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- The Texas city may be somewhat more populous, but not more significant. Don't oppose just because I got one fact wrong.--Prisencolin (talk) 15:46, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Pasadena, California, is easily the primary topic. — Gorthian (talk) 19:32, 19 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support. I think given that this CA Pasadena was the original one it would win a "long term significance battle", and it also dominates page views, Google hits etc. It is somewhat significant thtat the TX locality has greater population, but really it's just a dormitory suburb of Houston, and not such a significant one on a global level, so I think it's fair to declare a primary topic here. — Amakuru (talk) 10:20, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Clear primary topic. By far the best known entity by that name. -- Necrothesp (talk) 15:11, 20 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.