Talk:Partisan (politics)
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Deletion proposal
[edit]Why does this word deserve an encyclopedia entry? I'd like to propose that it be deleted, perhaps after any unique contented is copied to the appropriate article (e.g. monarchy). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hugetim (talk • contribs) 21:13, 22 July 2012 (UTC)
- I came to this page looking for partisan in the context of WWII, and thus I think it is valid, though perhaps needs to be renamed to something I cannot yet think of. It can contain historical material to support the uses of the word in other articles that would go beyond a wiktionary definition. --John Bessa (talk) 00:01, 14 July 2013 (UTC)
Maybe merge with Partiinost'
[edit]This entry is essentially the same with Partiinost'. Maybe the two entries should be merged into one?--Aronlee90 (talk) 01:58, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
Categories:
- Start-Class politics articles
- High-importance politics articles
- Start-Class American politics articles
- Top-importance American politics articles
- American politics task force articles
- Start-Class political party articles
- Top-importance political party articles
- Political parties task force articles
- WikiProject Politics articles