Jump to content

Talk:Part One (album)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 4 September 2024

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. General consensus to move to Part One (album) per WP:NOTPT and WP:ALBUMDAB. (closed by non-admin page mover) Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 10:55, 18 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Part OnePart One (The West Coast Pop Art Experimental Band album) – Pageviews shows here that the album is not even close to being the primary usage. The current target should be retargeted to Part 1. Gonnym (talk) 09:05, 4 September 2024 (UTC) — Relisting. Frost 11:20, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisting comment: consensus for move. Relisting to determine if it should move to Part One (The West Coast Pop Art Experimental Band album) or Part One (album). Frost 11:20, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
A bit confused by this relist - WP:ALBUMDAB is a well-established naming convention, and nobody has specifically expressed a desire to keep the unnecessary disambiguation of the OP's proposed title. 162 etc. (talk) 16:38, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hang on, there is Part I: John Shade, Your Fortune's Made and things with subtitles are usually ambiguous with the base title. As with Talk:Liverpool 1 (TV series)#Requested move 28 July 2024 I would have concerns about "One" and "1" being indistinguishable and note that I am a supporter of SMALLDETAILS. Crouch, Swale (talk) 17:58, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not aware of any sources that refer to the Fol Chen album by the abbreviated title "Part One". Hatnote is fine. 162 etc. (talk) 19:30, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that all 4 sources in the article don't use the title without the subtitle but I would keep in mind about people now knowing it has a subtitle unless its a title that could not be reasonably be referred to without the subtitle, see Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (films)#Does this apply to subtitles?. When it comes down to qualifiers it generally pays to be unambiguous. Crouch, Swale (talk) 16:41, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.