Talk:Pari passu

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Latin Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Latin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LatinWikipedia:WikiProject LatinTemplate:WikiProject LatinLatin articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

It seems to me that a subsection devoted to the discussion of the motto of a fairly unremarkable Canadian high school is a little out of place in an article primarily devoted to the usage of a legal/financial term. I think a "see also" note at the bottom pointing to the high school page, where the motto is also discussed, would be more appropriate. Without objection I will enact this change. Mnc4t 16:19, 27 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Good point, I changed it.

equally mistreated

Unreferenced. Plus: it's logical, but is that phrase biased?:

"In the European Union, as the result of the Greek government-debt crisis, a retroactive Collective action clause passed by the Greek government with the support of the ECB and IMF, enabled the debtor (who also controlled the courts) to impose a 70% loss of the creditors, more than 75% of whom had voted in favour of the cut. In this case, pari passu means that all private-sector investors are equally mistreated." -Shtove 22:41, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

"per capita" in pari passu inheritance

Your third paragraph example of pari passu inheritance is confusing. The fact that (child) A dies before (child) B will not delay or change the % inheritance of the testator's grandchildren. I think what you are trying to say is "if A dies before the testator, and B has more children after A's death but before the Testator's death, upon the Testator's death, the shares of all grandchildren will be smaller." The difference between per stipes and pari passu inheritance is that in a per stipes distribution the children of A (the Testator's grandchildren) will always divide their parent's share; in pari passu, the grandchildren's share will be equally decided by the number of grandchildren living at the Testator's death. Lesteralonzo (talk) 13:17, 9 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Pari passu. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20040812111212/http://home.pacific.net.sg/~chanpal/article12.htm to http://home.pacific.net.sg/~chanpal/article12.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:58, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]