Talk:Papen cabinet

	Europe portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject European history, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the history of Europe on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.European historyWikipedia:WikiProject European historyTemplate:WikiProject European historyEuropean history articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

8 September 2023 update

Cabinets of Weimar Germany (#19 of 20)

The purpose of the updates is to:

Standardize info boxes.

- Time in office includes caretaker period after formal resignation.

- Not all of the parties that weren't in the ruling coalition are listed as opposition – some 'tolerated' the government (esp. the SPD), or there isn't enough information on them to make a judgment if they were in active opposition or not. In that case I left them out.

Standardize tables of cabinet members ('Portfolio' is the office, not the office holder. I kept them simple, without repeating 'Ministry of…')

Expand introductory paragraphs to summarize the whole article.

Include at least minimal information on the cabinet's actions while in office.

Eliminate overuse of German words and phrases (notably 'Reich' = German / Germany).

Standardize capitalization of 'minister' (see MOS biography Positions, offices, and occupational titles section) and ministry names (see MOS Capital letters Institutions section).

GHStPaulMN (talk) 17:53, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]