User talk:GHStPaulMN

Comments and questions

Your submission at Articles for creation: Proclamation of the republic in Germany has been accepted

Proclamation of the republic in Germany, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 08:41, 10 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kingdom of Germany

Again, I do not agree with you, in all those cases in the article the use is of the actual title, it is not intended to be descriptive and therefore should be capitalised. Ecrm87 (talk) 20:46, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ecrm87 I'm not sure what you mean by "actual title" (what would another kind be?), and by the manual in the section I cut out they are descriptive because of the definite article. It also says that such titles "are capitalized only

a) when followed by a person's name to form a title

b) when a title is used to refer to a specific person as a substitute for their name during their time in office"

c) … "is not preceded by a modifier (including a definite or indefinite article)"

In the passage we're dissecting, no title is followed by a proper name (a); none is substituting for a specific duke, margrave or king – they're generic for any duke etc. who holds the title (b); and they all have the definite article 'the' in front of them (c).

- - - See also https://www.britannica.com/topic/elector It capitalizes just like I do on exactly the same topic. I know I'm not willing to argue with Britannica. Can we please say QED now? GHStPaulMN (talk) 21:58, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Very well, based on Britannica's usage I'll concede the titles. What I won't concede however is state name capitalisation, at no point is it united states of America, therefore it should always be Kingdom of, not kingdom of. Ecrm87 (talk) 22:43, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ecrm87 Thank you, and agreed on the state names. If I have any kingdom of X or duchy of Y in the article, they should definitely be changed.

GHStPaulMN (talk) 00:38, 11 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of markup from Gustav Ritter von Kahr

Hi, just a heads up, your edit removed some important markup, like the bold on the article title and the pronunciation template, but I fixed it. — W.andrea (talk) 21:01, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@W.andrea All of the markup changes (except the bolding, my bad) were deliberate choices on my part to remove what I consider to be unnecessary clutter. But they do seem to be standard, so I'll leave them be in future translations.

I backed out your links to "dictatorial" and "coup" as everyday words that shouldn't be linked; see MoS Linking under 'What should not be linked'. I also don't think Bavaria (especially since it puts 3 links in a row), minister president or Hitler need to be linked since they're either well known or self-explanatory, but I'll admit there's more reason to use them there. GHStPaulMN (talk) 22:03, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Removing "dictatorial" and "coup" works for me; I wasn't sure about adding them in the first place. I should mention though, I'd never heard of a minister president before today. And I think it's important to link Bavaria since in historical articles, place names can sometimes be deceptive (like, say, "Russia" meaning the Russian Empire instead of the Russian Federation). — W.andrea (talk) 23:17, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I just noticed you didn't mention the pronunciation template. That's important too because it specifies a standard format (i.e. language label, link to explanation, and narrow transcription instead of broad per MOS:IPA). — W.andrea (talk) 23:25, 8 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Request for feedback

Hello GHStPaulMN. I am responding to your request for comments on your revisions to the Weimar Republic article. I have admired the significant improvements that you have made, which substantively improved the content. I was especially impressed with the rewrite of the section on the Versailles Treaty which added much-needed organization and clarity. Keep up the good work.

I'd also like to take this opportunity to commend your re-write of the Prussian State Council article and your creation of the new article on the Prussian State Council (Nazi Germany); this was long overdue and was masterfully done. If I may, I would like to request that you add an English translation (or at least a German version that could be copied into a translation app) of the Law on the State Council. This would be extremely helpful in providing a clearer picture of the council and its composition. Also, please note that the referenced version in the article seems to be missing the last page; the article references Article 15 but that is not in the cited copy. I have searched but have been unable to locate a better version. I am hoping that your well-demonstrated bilingual research abilities can manage to find one. Thanks in advance for any further improvement you can render and keep up your quest for excellence in these areas.```` Historybuff0105 (talk) 15:12, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Historybuff0105: Hi, and thanks for the encouraging words on the Weimar Republic page. I'll keep chipping away at it.

As for the Prussian State Council page, I tracked down Article 15 in the text of a document that has some significant differences from the one in fraktur that's referenced now. As soon as I figure out what's behind that, I'll add a translation. It's a good idea for a document that's relatively short. Thanks for the prompt -- and for adding all the other links to the new article. GHStPaulMN (talk) 01:08, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@GHStPaulMN, I just saw your addition. I think it does a great job of clarifying and expanding on the composition and workings of the Council. Thanks for all your work in tracking this down and adding the further explanatory notes. A very comprehensive and impressive effort. Thanks once again. Historybuff0105 (talk) 15:00, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		The Rosetta Barnstar
		For your amazing efforts at translation. You are creating some high-quality articles, and we sorely need more translators. Work by people like you all too often goes unappreciated – thank you so much! House Blaster^talk 02:56, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Collaboration

Hey there! I've seen that you are an interested and knowledgeable editor about German history. I'm currently rewriting the article about Ostsiedlung and if you have time, please help me rewrite the article and hopefully bring it to GA class. Crainsaw (talk) 19:46, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Crainsaw Hello.. Intriguing request, although I admit that my first reaction was that Ostsiedlung is a topic I don't know much about. But before I answer, I'm curious to know what your interest is in rewriting the article. Is it mostly to make it GA, or does it also have problems or gaps that you'd like to address – and whichever it is, what kind of help you're looking for? Regards, GHStPaulMN (talk) 01:50, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

When I first came across the article it was in ruins. Most sections barely had any information. And used the same sources. I dlund and used newer sources to expand the sections about Bohemia. And am currently rewriting tge Northeastern Germany and Holstein section. The section about the Livonian Confederation doesn't even include anything about the Ostsiedlung. So in short the article needs a major expansion and improvement. Hopefully along the way it'll also become a GA article. Crainsaw (talk) 05:40, 13 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, GHStPaulMN. Thank you for your work on Reich Ministry for the Occupied Territories. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, I had the following comments:

Hey there! Hope you're having a great day. Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia with your article. I'm happy to inform you that your article has adhered to Wikipedia's policies, so I've marked it as reviewed. Have a fantastic day for you and your family!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 02:20, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Undefined sfn reference

Hi, in this edit to Papen cabinet you introduced sfn references to "Longerich 2015", but no such work is listed. This causes a no-target error. If you could fix it that would be great. DuncanHill (talk) 14:46, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@DuncanHill

Done GHStPaulMN (talk) 20:20, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, DuncanHill (talk) 21:38, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, GHStPaulMN. Thank you for your work on Law for the Protection of the Republic. User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge in Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 05:19, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy New Year, GHStPaulMN!

Happy New Year!

GHStPaulMN,
Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia.
Abishe (talk) 14:45, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Abishe (talk) 14:45, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 10

An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Majority Social Democratic Party of Germany, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Soviet republic.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:53, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Saxony during the Weimar Republic

Hi I'm Interested in the creation of a article about Saxony in the Weimar Republic. I was wondering if that's something you would like to take part in? Zyxrq (talk) 03:17, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Zyxrq Thanks for the offer, but my to-do list is pretty long already. If there are any particular points along the way that you want to try to pick my brain on, I'm always open for that. Have fun with the new article. GHStPaulMN (talk) 12:14, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 15

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Black Reichswehr, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eugen Ott.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:05, 15 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]