Talk:Panboli

This article was nominated for merging with Panpoli on 2021-09-12. The result of the discussion (permanent link) was redirect Panboli to Panpoli.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Panboli redirect.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

India: Tamil Nadu / Geography Low‑importance

	India portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This redirect is supported by WikiProject Tamil Nadu (assessed as Low-importance).
	This redirect is supported by the Indian geography workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Proposed merge of Panpoli with Panboli

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was Redirect Panboli to Panpoli . -MPGuy2824 (talk) 05:18, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Probably same village with different spelling. Unable to confirm. Venkat TL (talk) 05:33, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Panpoli. The Census of India site doesn't have data for any Panboli in Tamil Nadu. It does have data for Panpoli though. Also, Tenkasi seems to be a newly formed district which was split from Tirunelveli district, so they both match in that regard. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 13:42, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect Panboli to Panpoli. Changed my vote, since Panboli only has older (2001 census) data and there is nothing to merge left when that data is ignored. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 11:33, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.