Talk:Panagiotis Stamatakis

A fact from Panagiotis Stamatakis appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 14 March 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Panagiotis Stamatakis and Heinrich Schliemann quarrelled so much during their excavations at Mycenae that they spoke only through intermediaries?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2023/March. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Panagiotis Stamatakis.

Wikipedia

Biography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

Archaeology Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Classical Greece and Rome Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Greece Mid‑importance

	Greece portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Panagiotis Stamatakis has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: February 4, 2023. (Reviewed version).

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Panagiotis Stamatakis/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Mychemicalromanceisrealemo (talk · contribs) 15:02, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	No issue. Clear, concise, and cohesive.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.	Follows all guidelines mentioned. As a minor note, quote boxes are not advised in articles as `{{blockquote}}` is preferred, but the former is common enough that it's really not a big deal in my opinion. Further, outside of plant cultivars and glosses, double quotation marks should be used rather than single ones (see MOS:SINGLE). Once again, minor (but should be fixed).
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.	No issue.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).	No issue.
	2c. it contains no original research.	No issue.
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.	No issue.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.	No issue.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).	No issue.
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.	No issue.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.	No issue.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	No issue.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.	No issue.
	7. Overall assessment.	Meets all criteria. The only minor issues are the ones described in 1b, however compliance with other aspects of the Manual of Style or its subpages is not required for good articles as per WP:GACR.

Will get to this soon.--MY CHEMICAL ROMANCE IS REAL EMO!_{(talk or whatever)} 15:02, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! UndercoverClassicist (talk) 23:05, 3 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I've now corrected the MOS:SINGLE errors. UndercoverClassicist (talk) 18:15, 5 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cielquiparle (talk) 15:24, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that Panagiotis Stamatakis and Heinrich Schliemann quarrelled so much during their excavations at Mycenae that they spoke only through intermediaries? Source: In article: Vasilikou 2011, p107
- Reviewed:

Improved to Good Article status by UndercoverClassicist (talk). Self-nominated at 18:08, 5 February 2023 (UTC). Note: As of October 2022, all changes made to promoted hooks will be logged by a bot. The log for this nomination can be found at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Panagiotis Stamatakis, so please watch a successfully closed nomination until the hook appears on the Main Page.[reply]

This article has been recently promoted to GA, is long enough, and is well-sourced. The article is written neutrally, and a check with Earwig finds no plagiarism. The hook is formatted correctly, interesting, and cited inline by a source in Greek which loads slowly for me, so I am assuming good faith. UndercoverClassicist only has one DYK credit, so QPQ is not required. Overall, great work. gobonobo ⁺ ^c 16:46, 6 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- @Gobonobo: I notice this is still showing as 'pending' - should it be? If so, what's the next step? UndercoverClassicist (talk) 22:23, 1 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  - @UndercoverClassicist: It looks like this is in the approved list now. gobonobo ⁺ ^c 13:50, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    - Thanks - I can see that now. Just a heads up: it looks as though the DYK for Grip (raven) also links to this page. UndercoverClassicist (talk) 17:48, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]