Talk:Palo Alto Weekly
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in California may be able to help! The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Lack of reliable sources cited
[edit]This article is seriously lacking in reliable sources. The single reference provided is for a sentence that might reasonably be viewed as an advert. I would tag each sentence and delete those without references in a month or two, but I am familiar with this newspaper and know firsthand that most of the article is legit. Someone should go through it and provide sources from reliable secondary sources. PPdd (talk) 03:09, 11 December 2011 (UTC)
Spam?
[edit]"The newspaper is distributed free by mail to essentially all households in its market area."
Isn't that spam? Is there no way to stop it and save a few trees? Vaughan Pratt (talk) 05:54, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class Newspapers articles
- Low-importance Newspapers articles
- Stub-Class California articles
- Low-importance California articles
- Stub-Class San Francisco Bay Area articles
- Low-importance San Francisco Bay Area articles
- San Francisco Bay Area task force articles
- WikiProject California articles
- Stub-Class Journalism articles
- Low-importance Journalism articles
- WikiProject Journalism articles
- Wikipedia requested photographs in Santa Clara County, California