Talk:Padma Vibhushan/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ekvastra (talk · contribs) 09:15, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.

Comments

none of the conferments of Padma Vibhushan have been revoked or restored -- restored is redundant? --Ekvastra (talk) 09:26, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not actually. We need to mention that either of the cases did not happen.

during the change in the national government -- Government changes all the time? --Ekvastra (talk) 09:26, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done

communiqué -- English word for this? --Ekvastra (talk) 09:26, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done.

@Ekvastra: I have resolved your concerns. Please let me know if you have more. - Vivvt (Talk) 04:42, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bharat Ratna and Padma Vibhushan should have a line in context before its usage first time. Otherwise it sounds alien. References check out well. --Ekvastra (talk) 05:55, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done

@Ekvastra: Please check now. - Vivvt (Talk) 07:10, 29 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]