Jump to content

Talk:Pactum Warmundi

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineePactum Warmundi was a good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
May 27, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on July 26, 2006.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that the Pactum Warmundi established autonomous Venetian communes within the crusader Kingdom of Jerusalem?

Comments

[edit]

I took out the stub template. Hope that was the right thing to do. Andrew Dalby 15:38, 22 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GA nomination

[edit]

After having reviewed the article I've put it on hold per the following major problems (listed following the Good Article Criteria listing):

  • 1. This article is completely unreferenced, and according to the Wikipedia:Good article criteria this article needs lots of references (at least one per paragraph). It is not enough to put your sources at the bottom of the page, you need to provide references to your sources (ex:"Prawer, Joshua (1980). Crusader Institutions, pg. 12-14") and put them in the proper place.
  • 2. Does not contain any images. Per WP:WIAGA, the article should contain images appropiate to the subject.

I'll check back in seven days and see if the article has improved enough to deserve a GA promotion. Regards, Eurocopter tigre 11:40, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I will hog the glory and/or take the blame and claim responsibility for this article, so I will attempt to address these concerns as soon as I can, but it won't be in the next couple of days, unfortunately. Check back in another couple of weeks. Adam Bishop 01:09, 24 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]