Talk:Owen Goal

Comics: British Low‑importance

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by British comics work group.

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Merger

This is ridiculous, Owen Goal was in The Dandy for 12 years. It was popular too. 86.148.147.87 (talk) 14:44, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia.

It doesn't matter if this is "ridiculous" or for how long the strip was in the Dandy. Here, what matters is referencing from external sources, per WP:N. If there aren't any refs (and there's barely a handful across any of these Beano/Dandy comic strip stubs), it doesn't stay. If it really was so important that it was run for 12 years, there will surely be references. Andy Dingley (talk) 14:53, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Some things which could be used as references:

[1] I dont know how to make this a proper reference its in googlebooks

A couple of blogs [2] [3]

And Kellys Comics [4] Eopsid (talk) 15:55, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The google books one is already referenced this article does have references. Eopsid (talk) 15:56, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think this character is too notable to merged into the list of Dandy comic strips article. The other merger I have just suggested would be much more useful what with that article being almost an orphan and completely unreferenced unlike this article which actually has references unlike alot of the other beano/dandy comic strip articles. Eopsid (talk) 16:02, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]