Jump to content

Talk:Ove Almborn/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Esculenta (talk · contribs) 01:01, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Wolverine XI (talk · contribs) 08:04, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • After obtaining his degree in 1936, What degree?
  • he passed with commendable remarks Commendable is a little unencyclopedic
  • Link "Swedish Natural Science Research Council"
  • There, he broadened understanding of the region's Broadened not the right word here
  • Kärnefelt fondly recalls their first meeting in 1970 as the beginning of a lifelong friendship and professional relationship, during which Almborn guided him through the complexities of lichenology with encouragement and expert insight. Unencyclopedic tone
  • leaving a lasting legacy on many who passed through Lund University's botanical department. Again unencyclopedic
  • Almborn retired in 1980, although he kept active Kept active?
  • His stories of venerable botanists captivated and amused his colleagues, adding a personal touch to his scholarly presence. Unencyclopedic
  • He is remembered for his kindness, generosity, and the lasting influence of his scientific endeavors. Unencyclopedic once again
  • Through these contributions, Almborn left a lasting imprint on lichenology and botanical studies, ensuring that his influence would continue to be felt long after his passing. Yet another case
  • I've "neutralized" the tone for all of the "unencyclopedic" examples you pointed out; I don't want to remove them entirely, as his obituaries emphasize these aspects of his personality. Esculenta (talk) 19:55, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Overall, the phrasing is the main problem. Other than that, the article reads well and is in good shape. Wolverine XI (talk to me) 19:54, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reviewing this (and all of the other lichen-related reviews you've taken on!); let me know if you think additional improvement are needed. Esculenta (talk) 19:55, 16 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Nice work; promoting now. Wolverine XI (talk to me) 14:19, 17 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.