Talk:Otherness of childhood

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Otherness of childhood article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Sociology Mid‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Anthropology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Geography Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Geography To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : See Requested articles/Social sciences/Geography, cities, regions and named places and Missing articles about Locations
Assess : Tag related article talk pages with {{WikiProject Geography}}. To help assess the quality and importance of geography articles, please see: Unassessed geography articles and Unknown-importance geography articles.
Cleanup : See Geography articles needing attention
Deletion sorting : Listed at Geographic related deletion discussions
Geographical coordinates : See Articles missing geocoordinate data by country
Infobox : See Geography articles needing infoboxes
Map : See Wikipedia requested maps
Notability : See Geography articles with topics of unclear notability
Photo : See Wikipedia requested photographs of places
Stubs : See Geography stubs

Untitled

Hi

I dont see this as soap boxing. It is trying to set out a perfectly legimimate concept within the geographies of childhood. It would be soap boxing if it was saying this is right over other competing theories but it does not. It is trying to summerise a position which is being developed and which has been through critical scrutiny in the per reviewed papers which are referred to.

I dont see this enntry is different from, say, the entry on non-representational theory which states what the position of that approach is, who developed it and in what references. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Owainjones2 (talk • contribs) 21:48, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are trying to set out your concept - soapboxing. How's your NPOV? -- Mr Stephen 20:59, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Yes it is my concept but all concepts are someone's concepts. where do they come from otherwise? What is NPOV? Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by Owainjones2 (talk • contribs) 22:02, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

NPOV -- Vegaswikian 21:19, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vegaswikian beat me to it. I see from your talk page that you have been given some time to re-cast the article. -- Mr Stephen 21:29, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I know what npov is now and get the point (but is it really possible) I have tried to modify the article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Owainjones2 (talk • contribs) 22:44, 23 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You can add WP:NOR to why this should be speedy -- Gnevin 01:05, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

He's cited Cloke and Philo, this isn't original research. If he hadn't told you who he was you'd have no issue with the article. What you are demonstrating is the anti-elitist bias which plagues wikipedia. In literaty terms this is a well written article, and inclusion of such articles should be encouraged on wikipedia. The last thing oen should do is speedily delete them. -- Supposed 21:10, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Waste ground

Hello. I think that this is a good article, but I have one question. What does "waste ground" refer to? Is it a garbage dump, land with a lot of litter, or something else. It seems "waste" is used somewhat figuratively, and I don't know what type of ground I'm supposed to imagine. (Ejoty 02:55, 5 September 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Ejoty, I'll take a stab with my own reading of this sentence: Ideas of the otherness of childhood have connections with some children’s affinity with disordered spaces (those not managed and tidied by adult society) like waste ground in cities. I think that waste is being used not in the sense of garbage or refuse, but rather in the sense of a space that is inefficiently used by adult standards. Perhaps an abandoned building or lot in which children like to play would be a good example: while adults would see a dirty, run-down, economically adrift section of a city, children might see a place that they can make their own and on which they can impose their own world. I may be wrong, but I think you are wise to treat the term "waste ground" figuratively. -Phoenixrod (talk) 06:29, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]