Talk:Orthwein Mansion

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Missouri Low‑importance

	Missouri portal This article is part of WikiProject Missouri, a WikiProject related to the U.S. state of Missouri. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.MissouriWikipedia:WikiProject MissouriTemplate:WikiProject MissouriMissouri articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Suggested change

@Zigzig20s:.

Waymarking isn't a reliable source, in the same way that Wikipedia isn't - it is crowd sourced with no systematic mechanism for fact checking or accuracy: WP:WPNOTRS. Fortunately, Waymarking also gives the nomination form as its reference - I suggest you replace the Waymarking source with the nomination form. I have replaced some of the information that apparently came from the Focus DB for the historic district, such as the build date and architecture style, with the data from the inventory of homes given for 15 portland place.
You have listed three architects individually. The given waymarking references, as does the nomination form, gives the architectural firm of Widdman, Walsh and Boisselier. That should be what is in the article as the architect, not the named partners individually.

Generic1139 (talk) 04:31, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Individual notability

For the record, unless this house is distinguished in some way from the 93 other homes in the district, I suggest that it should be merged with the district article. The nominators for the HD didn't think it deserved an individual listing - why do we? Generic1139 (talk) 04:43, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I would suggest you try to be more constructive and collaborative and try to expand this article with references before trying to merge it. This house is notable for its connection to Anheuser-Busch as well as its architects, etc. I have no idea if the 93 other homes are notable and don't care; I have started working on an article about this house, not the other houses. The nominators listed the entire historic district for convenience (to avoid having to fill out 90+ forms). I intend to expand this article later but right now I am put off by your hostility.Zigzig20s (talk) 05:16, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Helpful is to correct the errors in the article, add the map, and make the HD article. Constructive and collaborative is discussing things on the talk page. Hostile would be to tag the page with a merge template. Really hostile would be to simply make the change myself. Per WP:COOL, there are 90,000 other NRHP properties - I'll go work on some of them. Generic1139 (talk) 15:23, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]