Talk:Orion-class battleship/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Iazyges (talk · contribs) 14:55, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Comments
[edit]- No dab links , no dead links , no copyvio .
- I would suggest removing the (RN) from "built for the Royal Navy (RN)", and then change the rest of the RNs to Royal Navy.
- I don't think so.
- "The Orions were deemed obsolete by the end of the war in 1918 and" Suggest changing to: "The Orions were deemed obsolete by the end of the war, in 1918, and"
- The year's not really a subordinate clause there.
- "A third dreadnought was added to the programme about April 1909" suggest changing about to around.
- "On her way to the scrapyard, she ran aground, but was refloated and scrapped the following year." Is it known where she ran aground?
- Added to the main body.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:29, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
- The supplement and Navy List links are dead.
- They all check out fine for me using the check external links in the toolbox.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:29, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
- When I try and open them from the article it gives me "ia700709.us.archive.org’s server DNS address could not be found." -- Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 19:38, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
- They changed the links on me, but everything's updated.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:45, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
- Passing now. -- Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 23:22, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
- They changed the links on me, but everything's updated.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:45, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
- When I try and open them from the article it gives me "ia700709.us.archive.org’s server DNS address could not be found." -- Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 19:38, 17 March 2017 (UTC)