Talk:Orion's Belt (film)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Khazar2 (talk · contribs) 14:31, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Arsenikk, I'll be glad to take this review. Initial comments to follow in the next 1-3 days. Thanks in advance for your work on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 14:31, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Initial comments

Glad to see you're continuing your work on Svalbard topics! As before, I've made some minor copyedits as I went. Please double-check that I haven't inadvertently introduced any error, and feel free to revert anything you disagree with.

This looks strong overall, and ripe for promotion. It's well written, well sourced, and appears comprehensive, though I still need to run one or two checks to make sure no major aspects are left out.

Here are a few points I didn't immediately understand well enough to fix:

"The original ending was created as a compromise resulting in a closing deadline and lack of funding, yet keeping the ending open. " -- I'm not really clear what this means--the compromise resulted in a lack of funding? Why is that?
"which weaved the storyline better together." -- this opinion should probably be attributed in-text--is there a specific author or critic who feels this way?
"The complaint was plainly rejected by the " -- what does "plainly" rejected mean here (as opposed to regular "rejected")?
"to make a film-political decision" -- what does "a film-political decision" mean? -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:00, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Closing review

Since it's been a week without response (and the nominator doesn't seem to have been on for a couple of weeks), I'm closing the review for now; though the points above are small ones, I'm unfortunately not in a position to clear them up myself. Though I'm not listing this for now, I hope you'll renominate soon once the small above points are addressed. Thanks again for your work on this. -- Khazar2 (talk) 04:46, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]