Talk:Orion's Belt (film)

Orion's Belt (film) was nominated as a Media and drama good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (April 13, 2013). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated.

Film: Nordic

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Nordic cinema task force.

Norway

	Norway portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Arctic Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Arctic, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Arctic on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArcticWikipedia:WikiProject ArcticTemplate:WikiProject ArcticArctic articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Orion's Belt (film)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Khazar2 (talk · contribs) 14:31, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Arsenikk, I'll be glad to take this review. Initial comments to follow in the next 1-3 days. Thanks in advance for your work on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 14:31, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Initial comments

Glad to see you're continuing your work on Svalbard topics! As before, I've made some minor copyedits as I went. Please double-check that I haven't inadvertently introduced any error, and feel free to revert anything you disagree with.

This looks strong overall, and ripe for promotion. It's well written, well sourced, and appears comprehensive, though I still need to run one or two checks to make sure no major aspects are left out.

Here are a few points I didn't immediately understand well enough to fix:

"The original ending was created as a compromise resulting in a closing deadline and lack of funding, yet keeping the ending open. " -- I'm not really clear what this means--the compromise resulted in a lack of funding? Why is that?
"which weaved the storyline better together." -- this opinion should probably be attributed in-text--is there a specific author or critic who feels this way?
"The complaint was plainly rejected by the " -- what does "plainly" rejected mean here (as opposed to regular "rejected")?
"to make a film-political decision" -- what does "a film-political decision" mean? -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:00, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Closing review

Since it's been a week without response (and the nominator doesn't seem to have been on for a couple of weeks), I'm closing the review for now; though the points above are small ones, I'm unfortunately not in a position to clear them up myself. Though I'm not listing this for now, I hope you'll renominate soon once the small above points are addressed. Thanks again for your work on this. -- Khazar2 (talk) 04:46, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Location of Soviet station - Kjerulføya or Kiepertøya

The article says that the location of the Soviet base is Kjerulføya, while on the actual movie (at least in Norwegian version) they refer to Kiepertøya, which is also more logical for the plot as they immediately after decide to sail along the coast of Barentsøya (and not Nordaustlandet) etc. I have seen the reference to the book but it does not seem convincing. Any more sources on this? Upior polnocy (talk) 02:43, 29 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]