Talk:Organization for the Resolution of Agunot

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 13 July 2015 by reviewer Sulfurboy (talk · contribs).

Organizations

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Controversial in American Jewish community

The credibility of the ORA organization among the wider American Jewish community is small given the perceived lack of due process in ORA's work; significant levels of social protest by Israeli citizens -men and women- against corruption and abuses of the State of Israel's rabbinical courts; that American judges have declared that Israel's rabbinical courts have "no comity" in USA courts; ORA's association with the orthodox rabbis sentenced in the 2013 New York divorce torture plot, and less illegal than torture and extortion but also embarrassing ultraorthodox methods such as herem banishment (medieval excommunications).

-Yohananw (talk) 13:54, 16 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

the above was deleted by user:iccuwaun, a user with no talk page entry. Ok this paragraph needs citations. The NJ court child abduction case of Ofir Ben-Chaim, ruled that Israel's batei din have no comity. To get ref as reported in legal journals... -Yohananw (talk) 16:36, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]