Talk:Organ transplantation in fiction

This article was nominated for deletion on 4 April 2015 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

Literature Low‑importance

	Literature portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Science Fiction Mid‑importance

	Speculative fiction portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science Fiction, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science fiction on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Science FictionWikipedia:WikiProject Science FictionTemplate:WikiProject Science Fictionscience fiction articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Novels Low‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Film

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles

Horror Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Donna McCormack has written a number of papers on this topic: see http://www.leeds.ac.uk/arts/people/20030/faculty_of_arts/person/2027/donna_mccormack -- The Anome (talk) 18:22, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Great, feel free to incorporate any such secondary sources to better comply with policy (WP:PSTS), and better withstand the tides of fancruft that tend to surround pop culture and fiction articles. --Animalparty-- (talk) 21:24, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also: getting away from the specific dystopian fiction theme: organ theft also features as a central plot element in Dirty Pretty Things. Also, see Repo Men, where artificial organs are repossessed from recipients who can't keep up on the payments. -- The Anome (talk) 18:25, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

There are now a lot more good references in the Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Organ transplantation in fiction AfD page. I've now dumped these into a "Futher reading" section; these should be properly used as sources later (and converted to proper citation formats, too).

Also: the film John Q is probably worth mentioning here. -- The Anome (talk) 12:23, 7 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also: another paper in review, but not yet published, from Donna McCormack: ‘Intruding Upon the Other: The Ethics of Organ Transplantation in Paris and Dirty Pretty Things’, The Journal of Literary and Cultural Disability Studies. -- The Anome (talk) 08:10, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Frankenstein

I've removed the mention of Shelley's Frankenstein - the book makes no mention of Frankenstein sewing together mismatched body parts or "pieces of cadavers", and doing so would be completely inconsistent with making the creature eight feet tall and proportionally large to facilitate dealing with the minuteness of the parts.

"When I found so astonishing a power placed within my hands, I hesitated a long time concerning the manner in which I should employ it. Although I possessed the capacity of bestowing animation, yet to prepare a frame for the reception of it, with all its intricacies of fibres, muscles, and veins, still remained a work of inconceivable difficulty and labour. I doubted at first whether I should attempt the creation of a being like myself, or one of simpler organization; but my imagination was too much exalted by my first success to permit me to doubt of my ability to give life to an animal as complex and wonderful as man. The materials at present within my command hardly appeared adequate to so arduous an undertaking, but I doubted not that I should ultimately succeed. I prepared myself for a multitude of reverses; my operations might be incessantly baffled, and at last my work be imperfect, yet when I considered the improvement which every day takes place in science and mechanics, I was encouraged to hope my present attempts would at least lay the foundations of future success. Nor could I consider the magnitude and complexity of my plan as any argument of its impracticability. It was with these feelings that I began the creation of a human being. As the minuteness of the parts formed a great hindrance to my speed, I resolved, contrary to my first intention, to make the being of a gigantic stature, that is to say, about eight feet in height, and proportionably large."

This is presumably an example of portrayals in other media intruding into discussion of the book. Perhaps mention Frankenstein (1931 film) instead?

tronvillain (talk) 12:43, 30 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

removal of template warnings

I've made a lot of edits on this article and I think most if not all of the current template warnings (additional citations, too many primary sources, reads like essay) could be removed at this point. I feel like someone who didn't make those edits should be the one to remove those warnings, so if anyone agrees those warnings are no longer needed please remove them. :-) (also, I'm somewhat knew to editing Wikipedia, is there a general forum where I could ask for a second opinion on articles for this sort of purpose or is the associated talk page the best place?) Thanks! Blanketstitch (talk) 16:27, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]