Talk:Order of Professional Technologists of Quebec

Canada: Quebec Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Quebec.

Language barrier

This article is important because this organization is one of the professional organizations in Canada for Engineering Technologists, but my french isn't good enough to do a thorough job. If anyone is bilingual, it'd be a good thing if we could get more information out of what we have.SJ Zero (talk) 15:56, 25 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 9 April 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Moved to Order of Professional Technologists of Quebec per the policy based reasoning by StraussInTheHouse. (non-admin closure) Iffy★Chat -- 12:26, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ordre des Technologues Professionnels du Quebec → Ordre des technologues professionnels du Québec – The French syntax requires that no capital letter be used with common nouns except on the first word of the organization's name (the rule is a bit more complicated but it works in the present situation), plus Québec requires an accent ("é") in French Muad (talk) 19:32, 9 April 2019 (UTC)--Relisting. B dash (talk) 13:11, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support move to Order of Professional Technologists of Quebec per Wikipedia:Article titles#Use English. There are plenty of English-language sources which use the English translation, including 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5. Source 4 is an especially compelling case for using English because it is from the Canadian branch of the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, so it is also a highly respected source in the given field. SITH (talk) 10:41, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.