Talk:Operation Double Eagle

Military history: North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

11 June 2018

These edits [1] made by User: A bicyclette without any edit summaries are misleading and repetitive. No WP:RS is given stating that this was an operational failure, Platt said it was a success and Krulak disagreed so Inconclusive is the correct result. We don't state ships and aircraft in an Infobox. The overlong discussion of the result in the introduction is unnecessary, the US almost always enjoyed fire supremacy in Vietnam and arguably the buildup of the supporting arms was observed by the PAVN/VC and made them leave the area. The same applies in the Aftermath. I revised all this but A bicyclette immediately reverted it: [2] A bicyclette also needs to cite refs properly, Shulimson is already there as a ref, while you can't just add bare urls as references. Mztourist (talk) 14:38, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]