Talk:Operation Boomerang/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs) 05:51, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
This article is in good shape. Just a few minor comments from me:
- suggest saying in the lead where Palembang was ie on Sumatra in the NEI
- aviation gasoline for aircraft is probably unnecessary
- Oops, yes Nick-D (talk) 23:24, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- XX Bomber
cCommand - should Lend-lease be Lend-Lease?
- Both fixed Nick-D (talk) 23:24, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- what types of aircraft were the Japanese fighter regiments equipped with?
- Some combination of Nakajima Ki-43 and Nakajima Ki-44 day fighters, I think. I can't confirm this from online sources, and my go-to source for this kind of thing (an obscure collection of post-war Japanese reports) was destroyed when the ANU Library flooded early this year. I'll try to clarify this ahead of an ACR. Nick-D (talk) 23:24, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- "The aircraft flew"
- Fixed Nick-D (talk) 23:24, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- What makes combined fleet.com reliable?
- Several of its editors are professionally published historians, with their books being very well reviewed. The site has also been extensively used as a reference in published works. The author of the article used here has been a historical consultant to several relevant documentaries and written or contributed to several relevant professionally published works. Nick-D (talk) 23:24, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- the images are both fine.
That's me done, nice job. Placing on hold for the above to be addressed. Cheers, Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 06:14, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for your review - I think that I've responded to your comments. Nick-D (talk) 23:24, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- This article is well-written, verifiable using reliable sources, covers the subject well, is neutral and stable, contains no plagiarism, and is illustrated by appropriately licensed images with appropriate captions. Passing. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 01:48, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks again Nick-D (talk) 01:56, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
- This article is well-written, verifiable using reliable sources, covers the subject well, is neutral and stable, contains no plagiarism, and is illustrated by appropriately licensed images with appropriate captions. Passing. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 01:48, 19 August 2018 (UTC)