Talk:Open-source architecture

Architecture Mid‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Open (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Open, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.OpenWikipedia:WikiProject OpenTemplate:WikiProject OpenOpen articles

This entry is speculative and is not based on research. It needs to be rewritten. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.64.209.229 (talk) 13:43, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This article has been mentioned by a media organization:

David Pescovitz (2011-06-21). "Open Source Architecture". BoingBoing. Archived from the original on 2011-06-21. Retrieved 2011-06-21.

OR

This article is WP:OR per this page.--217.157.165.109 (talk) 20:27, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mirror

This page started out as a mirror of the following:

http://www.domusweb.it/en/op-ed/open-source-architecture-osarc-/

There is no copyright violation, because the original is an an open-source document, but it doesn't come close to being encyclopedic. Does anyone have any suggestions as to what we should do about this? --Guy Macon (talk) 08:55, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Also see: http://boingboing.net/2011/06/21/open-source-architec.html --Guy Macon (talk) 09:00, 27 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've attempted to improve some of the original concerns for this page; inline citations, references from primary sources, neutral encyclopedic tone and updated content from recent developments in the field with appropriate citations. I hope this edit leads to a higher rating for the page as well as remove some of the concerns ArchitectPrime (talk) 01:31, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for working on it. Go ahead and remove some of the concern tags if/when you think you've addressed them well enough. Dicklyon (talk) 03:27, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]