Talk:Online shopping in Bangladesh

This article was nominated for deletion on 11 January 2023. The result of the discussion was merge.

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Bangladesh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bangladesh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BangladeshWikipedia:WikiProject BangladeshTemplate:WikiProject BangladeshBangladesh articles

WikiProject Bangladesh To-do list:

Add more images to Bangladesh Liberation War and related pages
Clean up Climate change in Bangladesh, it needs a lot of work
Clean up History of Bangladesh after independence, it needs NPOV
Improve Bangladesh back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion)
Improve Bengali language back to FA as it was demoted (see discussion)
Improve Bengalis and related pages
Take a look at the requested articles.
Make a MRT line 3 article.
Extend, add an infobox and a map of New Eskaton to New Eskaton.

Internet

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (this is a quite often asked question and searched and this article has good resource and references to be retain. thanks!) --Mzhosen (talk) 11:07, 6 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The future of this article

Hi all, including User:Rovine. I'm not sure this article should be deleted. The subject seems good. What it needs, in my view, is serious copy editing, a bunch of good references to support the prose, and consensus here that only online shopping organizations with Wikipedia articles should be allowed. Otherwise, this will turn into a spam magnet. Maybe it will anyway, but a few watchers and an invisible message should help. Thoughts? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 10:56, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I also think this article should be kept. Maybe we should establish a guideline for which sites can be allowed on this article? George8211 / T 10:12, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Not a bad idea. User:Apparition11 and others, thoughts? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 13:06, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I think that including websites with WP articles would work if we link to their articles instead of their website. Bikroy.com is the only one that was included in the long list. There were internal links to Dutch Bangla Bank and BRAC Bank, but adding banks seems to be stretching the scope IMHO. If one could be found, an external directory of relevant sites could also be considered. Apparition¹¹ ^Complaints/Mistakes 13:29, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

That sounds good. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 22:42, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]