Talk:Ongud

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ethnic groups, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to ethnic groups, nationalities, and other cultural identities on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Ethnic groupsWikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groupsTemplate:WikiProject Ethnic groupsEthnic groups articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Ethnic groups open tasks:

Here are some open WikiProject Ethnic groups tasks:

Meta-tasks:
- Place the {{Ethnic groups}} template on the talk page of articles within the scope of this project.
- Resolve the disparity in importance rankings among different ethnic groups
Articles about ethnic groups that currently have issues needing resolution:
Start an article:
- Wikipedia:WikiProject Ethnic groups/Article requests

Feel free to edit this list or discuss these tasks.

Mongols: Mongol Empire Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mongols, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mongol culture, history, language, and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MongolsWikipedia:WikiProject MongolsTemplate:WikiProject MongolsMongols articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Mongol Empire task force.

Title

At least online, "Ongut" seems to be much more popular than "Ongud". Do we have a Mongolian spelling (classic or modern)? --Latebird 19:43, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have "Öngüt" in J.P. Roux. Best regards. PHG (talk) 18:09, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Onggud or Ongud is better in Mongolian language. Ongut is corruption of these two--Enerelt (talk) 02:33, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Turkic not Mongolic

Onguds were Turks, not Mongols. The article itself suggested it, but many authors speak about them as being Turkic, including the contemporary sources. --Governor Sheng (talk) 23:50, 15 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]