Talk:One Man Band (film)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the One Man Band (film) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Animation: American / Films / Computer / Pixar Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Animated films work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Computer animation work group (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Pixar work group (assessed as High-importance).

Film: American / Animated

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the American cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the Animated films task force.

Disney Low‑importance

	Disney portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disney, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of The Walt Disney Company and its affiliated companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DisneyWikipedia:WikiProject DisneyTemplate:WikiProject DisneyDisney articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States: Animation / Cinema Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Animation portal This article is supported by WikiProject Animation - American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	Film portal This article is supported by WikiProject Film - American cinema task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled

The Mark Andrews linked in this article is most likely a different person than the one who directed the film One Man Band. Disambiguation is needed.

Disambiguation is also needed from the musical genre; we're blocking Mayor McCA, Hasil Adkins, and The Lonesome Organist here! --scruss 15:51, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Technological breakthroughs?

Each Pixar short is usually a testing ground for experimental rendering techniques that usually ends up in the subsequent feature film (cloth, skin, feathers, hair, outdoor vistas, etc). What new development was shown in this short? Navstar 05:20, 10 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

According an interview in Animation World Magazine, no new technology was used in this short [1] Navstar 05:38, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If nothing else, I think this is the first Pixar short to feature dueling one-man bands... — tregoweth (talk) 21:01, 11 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

According to this [[2]], "With the short films, we try out new technology and use them to train new directors," Shurer says. "Also (we break in) other lead production people. So, on One Man Band, we had a first-time director, a first-time lead animator, a first-time production designer."

I would consider editing or removing the line "The story might be considered a fictionalized retelling of the relations between two animation studios (such as Pixar and Pacific Data Images) as they go to more and more elaborate lengths to amuse a small child." as it is without reference and based on a somewhat vague possible interpretation of the film. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.58.149.137 (talk) 21:44, 9 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:OneMandBandfilm.jpg

Image:OneMandBandfilm.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 14:58, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

your page or the discussion are not related to my research. Why are you including the non since text or discussion? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.177.140.42 (talk) 06:06, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]